thebabydoc
New member
Are you kidding me? This is like a 1st grade argument you are making. "Fence" my ass. Can I make this any clearer for you? I am pro death penalty- that means I agree it is ok to put someone to death who has been found guilty of a crime for which crime the penalty is death.bigguns7 said:
Didn't you just say you were pro death penalty? Do you think it's conceivable that the men who are fried in the chair do not wish to die? Isn't execution a concious decision to take life?
You should choose a side of the fence to stand on doc.
Execution is a conscious decision made by our court system, a jury, a judge, etc... to take the life of a person who has been deemed deserving of it by virtue of (among other things) the conscious nature of his action(s) which resulted in his taking of another human life. The heinousness of the act is not in and of itself to merit the death penalty.
The "euthanasia" I was referring to was the killing of insane people which had been previously offered as the end-all solution to society's mental-health problems. In any event, the defense being advanced is that this woman's actions were not conscious or controllable due to her mental illness. I asked before and asked again, does anyone here believe that this woman truly understood what she was doing when she murdered her five children?