thebabydoc said:
Seabass: As for the Bin Laden reference, I can only guess that you must be joking. A small difference here: PREMEDITATION. The act of a madman is not necessarily the act of someone whose mental deficiency eliminates their ability to distinguish right from wrong.
While I don't entirely disagree with your characterization of OUR system and the fact that the mentally ill often present a serious danger to society and usually cannot be rehabilitated or cured, you are suggesting euthanizing people who do not wish to die. In other words, MURDER. That makes you no better than the people you advocate killing. In fact, that makes you worse because while their actions may be beyond their control, yours represent a concious decision to take life.
OK wait, so what you are saying with your premeditation bit is that a insane person is not able to pre-meditate a murder. Their insanity comes in spurts without their consent? And then they go on a murderous rampage, right? THen they snap out and state that they went insane during their murders. There death sentence avoided.
By simple logic, anyone who is a murderer is insane, they are not fit to function in society and are "not all there" in their head. So we should just abolish all prisons and capital punishment in favor of high security mental wards. PLease, what a crock.
She showed premeditation, motive, and a clear knowledge of what she was doing. She also mentally tourmented her husband for years. And to think there are some uninfomred idiots on this board who have the gaw to accuse her husband of not being supportive to HER needs. What about HIM? His family and kids are gone? What about his kids? His children are gone.
By all rights i think that the death penalty for her is too good. She should be slowly tortured and kept alive for years on end kinda like the monsters in HELLBOUND HELLRAISER.