Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Coach on trial for dating 15-year-old

velvett said:
I have a shocker story for you and I just saw this girl the other day in the park.

A 10 year old girl was molested by her uncle, three years ago in my town and she was kept in school as long as possible until her belly was too large to hide. A teacher (a friend of mine) tutored her at home for the rest of the school year.

She was playing in the park the other day with her son and a woman payed the little boy a compliment to the young girl and she asked "Is he your little brother" - "No" she said, "He is my son."

I can't describe to you the expression on the woman's face and this 13 year old girl took it all in stride.

No charges were pressed and the uncle - is still connected to the family.

someone outside the family should have reported the uncle - not many girls would be so sanguine about it all, many would be destroyed for life.
 
blueta2 said:
LOL......well 15 yr olds are not mentally developed anough to get it.

But 16 year olds can consent to drive 2 ton motor vehicles that can endanger other's lives? Seriously... they can make decisions in a god damn SUV on the interstate cruising at 70 mph in the middle of rush hour traffic, but they can't make a decision whether or not have sexual intercourse.

(This is probably similar to the argument of 18, 19, and 20 year old Americans wondering why they can kill and die for their contry but not consume a single alcoholic beverage.)



:cow:
 
samoth said:
But 16 year olds can consent to drive 2 ton motor vehicles that can endanger other's lives? Seriously... they can make decisions in a god damn SUV on the interstate cruising at 70 mph in the middle of rush hour traffic, but they can't make a decision whether or not have sexual intercourse.

(This is probably similar to the argument of 18, 19, and 20 year old Americans wondering why they can kill and die for their contry but not consume a single alcoholic beverage.)



:cow:

I think 16-17 yr olds are cognitive enough to make decisions, such as to be a responsible driver but a 16-17 has not evolved or developed emotionally.
 
blueta2 said:
Not sure what to make of this story.....

Coach on trial for dating 15-year-old
CanWest News Service
Published: 9 hours ago

A woman pleaded not guilty to charges she sexually exploited a 15-year-old girl she used to coach in soccer. In a videotaped police interview, the girl said she and Jillian Maureen Anderson, 23, hung around together and exchanged emails. During one soccer trip, the girl said Anderson tickled her on a hotel bed. On their return home, they began exchanging emails, which her parents eventually found. There was no contact between the two for six months until September last year when they resumed seeing each other.

Anderson broke up with her boyfriend and later suggested they "try dating." The relationship evolved from kissing and hugging to sex. The girl claimed she never said no.


© The Gazette (Montreal) 2007



Here are a couple points that need to be considered.

First a true pedophile persues and desires sex with children that have not gone through puberty or who are just starting puberty. Once a victim or potential victim reaches the advanced stages of puberty, a true pedophile looses interest. Pedophiles and other sex offenders tend to be very specific in what types of kids/victims (age, appearance, ect) they groom and molest.

Second, this female coach had a position of trust and authority in the community and over this young girl, and this automatically increases the severity of the alleged offense.

Third, depending upon the state laws or in this case Canadain law, if this girl is below the age of consent, this coach should be charged with statuatory rape. Some of you may disagree, but in my profession I have practically had to go toe to toe with females who would not support bringing forth charges on an adult female who was having sex with a teen boy becuase they believe it is different for boys.


Their rationale is this: the boy had to get an errection inorder for the couple to have sex; thus this boy was a willing participant. Thus no crime occured, and the female offender is just misguided in looking for love. To which i call utter and complete BS!!

Pedophila and sex offenders by definition have deviant patterns of sexual arrousal and they do not comply with societal norms and laws, and that is the crux of this case.

I have seen up close and personal what happens to young boys who were sexually involved with teachers and adults in authority over them. Their lives are never the same after the experince, and you start to see mental health problems, suicide and drug use as they go through life. An aquaintance of mine was seduced(probably did not require much effort though) into an affair with one of the high school staff while I was going through high school, and it has taken a toll upon him.

This coach is a sex offender(providing that she did what she is accused of) and not a pedophile. If the girl that the coach had sex with was 9 y rs old, it would be accurate to categorise her as a pedophile.

I personally think this woman should be treated exactly like a male who had sex with an under age girl, and that her crime was enhanced by the fact that she is a teacher. If she did what she is accused of, this Coach is a sex offender and she should have to register as such.

We can not take lightly anything that presents a threat to our children attending school in a safe healthy environmebt that is free from sexual exploitation like this whether the perpetrator be a man or a woman.

I would suspect that there is a female version of NAMBLA, and in their eyes this Coach was just seeking out a loving relationship and that having sex with minors is ok if you like that sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
blueta2 said:
you see, that's why I started this thread with, I'm not sure what to make of this.
I also think a 23 yr old female having sex with a 16 yr is wrong. But the 16 yr old male would not see that. My nephew is 16 and he would bang some hot 23 yr old in a second.

"Interesting that not one of you guys find this wrong?
I actually don't find anything wrong with this either, but if the 23 yr old was a male, I would find it wrong and maybe so would some of you?"

I see this as a contradiction of your earlier statement that I quoted above. On what grounds do you justify the difference between not finding it wrong when an adult female is sexually invloved with a male who is still a minor vs an adult male having sex with an under age girl.

The second highlighted section of your statement sounds like a double standard.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom