He was doing work at Abu Ghraib as well?
Interesting. Yeah, he could have been set up to deflect criticism; my original take was that Iraqi police set him up as they knew he was Jewish, unarmed and independent, and an Iraqi policeman had a link to an insurgent group.
But that seems questionable too. The previaling attitude of the Iraqi police is probably "don't fuck with Americans". So would they do this?
Let's look at at "outcomes"
1. Criticism of the abuse at Abu Ghraib has all but been silenced - in fact justified - in the minds of many. Even if the new pictures come out, it becomes a question of "stupid reservists" vs. a vicious murder. The abuse scandal goes away when a few low level guys are court martialed, yet it had been so bad that Bush went on TV in te middle east and apologized.
Note: Bush could not think of one mistake leading up to 9/11, but he apologized for the abuse scandal. RE-elections are a bitch huh?
2. There is a new enemy to focus on: this Al-Zarkawi guy. (Where is bin laden?). Zarkawi is from Jordan I believe, but he operates in Iraq and has ties to al-Qaeda. Finally, a link to al-Qaeda in Iraq.
The invasion can be prolonged, the abuse scandal goes under the rug, and there is a new enemy in country.
Not too bad, if you're the sitting President who launched the war.
Read between the lies.