The ACLU Is Fighting For The 'Right' For Women To Go Topless In Public

[Frackal]

The law is there so that your religion should have no influence over how the state deals with me and vice-a-versa.

IMO 99.95% of all southern baptist are hypocritical sacks of shit and have no business dictating morals or laws to anyone!

Totalyl true...Curling is an example of a total bullshit hypocrite

 

[bwood]

Actualy, at the time of of its drafting, an "establishment of religion" meant "church"

how could you possibly interpret "establishment of religion" to mean "preference by government of one or more religions over others..." that interpretation makes no sense

that is exactly what curling does, he takes something out of the bible and interprets it to mean whatever the hell he wants

i feel guilty about considering giving you the award two weeks in a row...

you are playing semantic card tricks while drawing from
an illiterate deck...

you dismiss what i posted about the early actions of congress, which totally supports my argument, which is by the way, drawn from the writings of constitutional scholars...

and you had to do this to even attempt your mendantic argument...

so, while i am not quite ready to refer to you as a "red diaper baby," i must question whether or not your keepers lined the floor of your cage with copies of the "port huron statement..."

selah...

 

[BonerBoy]

you dismiss what i posted about the early actions of congress, which totally supports my argument, which is by the way, drawn from the writings of constitutional scholars...

This is why I dismissed what you posted

how could you possibly interpret "establishment of religion" to mean "preference by government of one or more religions over others..." that interpretation makes no sense

An establishment of religion is a church dumbass

you suck and no one gives a fuck about your stupid award

you can't win an arguement so you're start throwing childish insults

"Red diaper baby" wtf? this is an adult chat board so grow the fuck up

 

[BonerBoy]

you dismiss what i posted about the early actions of congress, which totally supports my argument, which is by the way, drawn from the writings of constitutional scholars...

Ever think about reading that shit before you cut and paste

 

[BonerBoy]

i feel guilty about considering giving you the award two weeks in a row...

you are playing semantic card tricks while drawing from
an illiterate deck...

and you had to do this to even attempt your mendantic argument...

mendantic is not even a word, you moron

 

[Frackal]

pedantic??

 

[bwood]

This is why I dismissed what you posted

how could you possibly interpret "establishment of religion" to mean "preference by government of one or more religions over others..." that interpretation makes no sense

An establishment of religion is a church dumbass

you suck and no one gives a fuck about your stupid award

you can't win an arguement so you're start throwing childish insults

"Red diaper baby" wtf? this is an adult chat board so grow the fuck up

please my limited friend...

explain how the govt not showing preference towards
one or more churchs over others, differs from the govt not showing a preference towards one or more religions over others...

and you still ignore the historical facts about the early congresses that i posted...there is blatant revisionism in your contention that this is irrelevant...or ignorance beyond the power of words to describe...in that your interpretation only gives my argument added weight...

why dont you admit that there is no difference in either interpretation (even though yours is wrong) other than it fits better into the amyloid plaque encrusted synapses of your inadequate brain...

and for your edification, "mendantic" is a deliberate slurring, on my part, of the word "mendicant" which means fool or idiot, which you are showing yourself to be...

a "red diaper baby" is one that was raised by communist parents, and therefore never really stood any chance of becoming of thinking human being...it is a term used by strict constitutionalists to describe things like you in a derogatory manner...

if my insults are childish, isnt it damning that you are not capable of understanding them???

i only insult you because of the paucity of your argument, and your dogged determination that you are right, inspite of the facts that i shown condemning your argument...

you serve your liberal lords and masters well...

perhaps you could sing me a chorus of "four legs good, two legs bad" while rolling your eyes back into your head and anally masturbating yourself with the socialist manifesto...

choose life...

 

[biteme]

I don't think this a good idea. We will become desensitized to titties. I don't want that to happen because I like to suck on them.

 

[Jimsbbc]

uh, what about fucking them? wrapping them around my German sausage is the best! bring on the heavy hangars! I don't give a FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[BonerBoy]

please my limited friend...

again with the childish insults

explain how the govt not showing preference towards
one or more churchs over others, differs from the govt not showing a preference towards one or more religions over others...

You know thats not what I said, this is what I said when you tried to misinterpret the first amendment

how could you possibly interpret "establishment of religion" to mean "preference by government of one or more religions over others..." that interpretation makes no sense

preference of religion by government is'nt mentioned or inferred and had nothing to do with the framers intentions, it is spelled out precisely of their intent and has been appealed and upheld in the courts

You think you can come here and intentionaly misinterpret the first ammendment and I called BULLSHIT on your post

and you still ignore the historical facts about the early congresses
that i posted...there is blatant revisionism in your contention that this is irrelevant...or ignorance beyond the power of words to describe...in that your interpretation only gives my argument added weight...

do you have any comprehension at all?

why dont you admit that there is no difference in either interpretation (even though yours is wrong) other than it fits better into the amyloid plaque encrusted synapses of your inadequate brain...

the differerence is that you are trying to imply that that when the framers wrote:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
you imply that what they meant was:
"Congress shall make no law respecting preference by government of one or more religions over others..."

anyone with any comprehension knows that they meant it to mean a hell of alot more than that
it's fairly obvious their intentions, here it is in its entirety, where does it say anything about preference of religion?

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

and for your edification, "mendantic" is a deliberate slurring, on my part, of the word "mendicant" which means fool or idiot, which you are showing yourself to be...

I think I'm showing YOU to be the fool and a jack ass to

a "red diaper baby" is one that was raised by communist parents, and therefore never really stood any chance of becoming of thinking human being...it is a term used by strict constitutionalists to describe things like you in a derogatory manner...

yes of course I know "red" means communist and of course "diaper baby" means infant, I just find it strange you would accuse me of being a communist simply because I'm not buying your BS as I would think not many do

if my insults are childish, isnt it damning that you are not capable of understanding them???

No, I understand them and no it is'nt damning just childish

i only insult you because of the paucity of your argument, and your dogged determination that you are right, inspite of the facts that i shown condemning your argument...

you insult me because you are childish and can't argue your points based on facts so you resort to insulting my intelligence like any little kid might do

you serve your liberal lords and masters well...

the only thing you know about me is that I called BullShit on you when i seen it, so no need to try and put a label on me

perhaps you could sing me a chorus of "four legs good, two legs bad" while rolling your eyes back into your head and anally masturbating yourself with the socialist manifesto...

choose life...

Wow your parents realy did a number on you, lol