jackangel
New member
austin, i have a few questions for you, which someone else on this thread may or may not have asked. if you've already explained this somewhere else, point me to it.
i can understand your disgust with a perverted man like this. and i can understand that you think he deserves death, not only because he's a sick, twisted fuck, but also because you think he will continue to violate in increasingly worse ways. you've seen what these kinds of people can do, first hand. it hits close to home, right?
but the most important reason for your attitude/position is a practical one, isn't that true? you don't trust the justice system to take care of these offenders, and you know this from personal experience. so, something needs to be done, and in straightforward cases like this, it make sense to take care of business by ourselves, instead of waiting for the authorities to fuck it up.
i can accept all of that. but if so, why is it necessary or even acceptable to do to such men what those 6 people did to this man?
if you think he deserves to die, you kill him. but why beat him for an hour and then sodomize him with a tree branch? that is an ugliness all its own, and it belongs solely to the angry mob doing it.
do you think that brutality is the right thing, because he deserves that kind of punishment before he dies? or is it merely something you would tolerate, because of the intensity of emotion and the egregious nature of the crimes involved here?
thank you.
i can understand your disgust with a perverted man like this. and i can understand that you think he deserves death, not only because he's a sick, twisted fuck, but also because you think he will continue to violate in increasingly worse ways. you've seen what these kinds of people can do, first hand. it hits close to home, right?
but the most important reason for your attitude/position is a practical one, isn't that true? you don't trust the justice system to take care of these offenders, and you know this from personal experience. so, something needs to be done, and in straightforward cases like this, it make sense to take care of business by ourselves, instead of waiting for the authorities to fuck it up.
i can accept all of that. but if so, why is it necessary or even acceptable to do to such men what those 6 people did to this man?
if you think he deserves to die, you kill him. but why beat him for an hour and then sodomize him with a tree branch? that is an ugliness all its own, and it belongs solely to the angry mob doing it.
do you think that brutality is the right thing, because he deserves that kind of punishment before he dies? or is it merely something you would tolerate, because of the intensity of emotion and the egregious nature of the crimes involved here?
thank you.