Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

6 People beat Up Peeping Tom

Status
Not open for further replies.
strongsmartsexy said:
Next you'll be advocating cutting off the foot of speeders, or possibly the hands of shoplifters. Maybe skip the justice system altogether and just hand out guns and let the most viscious survive.
EF has several fans of this system.

I'm not one of course. I'd like to send the most viscuous to their own island and let them cut each other up.
 
strongsmartsexy said:
Flipping over tables of the money changers at the temple. Makes you wonder about church bake sales and such huh?

You can believe he would have shoved a tree limb up a peeping tom's ass? But he wouldn't allow people to stone that woman? If I recall it was something similar to "he who is without sin cast the first stone". I think the word I'm looking for is incongruous.

According to the New Testament, when the Romans came to arrest Jesus and take Him away to die, one of the disciples struck off the ear of a soldier -- Jesus told the disciple to put away his sword, and healed the severed ear miraculously. So, the disciples had swords... but their Boss wasn't gung-ho about using them.

(Why wasn't that disciple chopped into mincemeat on the spot? That sounds like yet another miracle.)

Then again, He also is recorded as saying that "Anyone who would lead one of these innocents (that is, children) into sin, better for him if he had never been born."
 
The guy probably deserved to get his ass beat, but with the insertion of tree limbs into his ass they went a little too far. You can always say that bruises came from defending yourself, but a limb sticking out of his rear end is kinda difficult to explain. :worried:
 
If I think about the possible charges on either side of this here's what I think would be there.

For the masturbator:
Indecent exposure
Public Nudity
Peeping (If they have such a law there)

For the mob that beat him:
Feloneous assault
Rape
Sodomy
Gang related additions (if that state has them)
Torture
Attempted murder (if he doesn't die) murder if he does.
With the "Patriot Act" they could also be charged with terrorism as we've seen in a previous thread about gang activity...


Can you think of others? What is the difference in what he did if there were a 30 year old woman sleeping in the room? Or a 30 year old man?

Beating his ass for an hour by 6 people is hard to explain. At what point was he a threat, (with his pants down around his ankles) where there had to be more than one assailant? And at what point was it beyond reason to keep beating him instead of calling the police? 2 minutes, 4 minutes, 20 minutes?
 
digger said:
According to the New Testament, when the Romans came to arrest Jesus and take Him away to die, one of the disciples struck off the ear of a soldier -- Jesus told the disciple to put away his sword, and healed the severed ear miraculously. So, the disciples had swords... but their Boss wasn't gung-ho about using them.

(Why wasn't that disciple chopped into mincemeat on the spot? That sounds like yet another miracle.)

Then again, He also is recorded as saying that "Anyone who would lead one of these innocents (that is, children) into sin, better for him if he had never been born."

Within or outside of context, what is the text in red saying?
 
Last edited:
Yea let the cops handle it, the guy will be back out on the street in a few years, and then he can go terrorize more children, possibly evolve as a criminal, and really do some damage? For every person this has happened to (being a victim of someone let out of prison that never should of been able to leave) I would like to see you go to these people and explain how great our justice system is, and how the person who killed, raped, etc there loved one was taken care of by the law just as he should of been even though we KNOW thats complete bullshit
 
Another double standard.

What about the man who was beaten loved ones? He is also the victim but you seem not to think so.
 
reword that sentance you make no sense? A man who WAS beaten loved ones? He is a victim? ummm yea whatever tard
 
Austin316 said:
Yea let the cops handle it, the guy will be back out on the street in a few years, and then he can go terrorize more children, possibly evolve as a criminal, and really do some damage? For every person this has happened to (being a victim of someone let out of prison that never should of been able to leave) I would like to see you go to these people and explain how great our justice system is, and how the person who killed, raped, etc there loved one was taken care of by the law just as he should of been even though we KNOW thats complete bullshit

I AM one of those people who has had that happen to one's close to me. More than one instance as well. I'm STILL not above the law. What you nor anyone else is able to quantify, for obvious reasons, is how many of these folks never do anything further, or even manifest it beyond simple peeping. If I were to use your logic, then those six people should be killed. Since they're likely to do what they did an even more at some other time. Hell, they may even decide jaywalking is criminal. Or they may covert to muslim and believe that if a woman isn't wearing a burhka she's a whore and deserves to die, or possibly that the US is nothing but a bunch of infidels and they should fly planes into buildings with thousands of the evil unbelievers and infidels. or....
 
Austin316 said:
reword that sentance you make no sense? A man who WAS beaten loved ones? He is a victim? ummm yea whatever tard
He's asking about the loved ones of the man beaten.

He is a victim of a crime or multiple crimes, which is why the 6 are being charged. Or do you feel they commited no crime? Are you saying that 6 people beating a man for 6 hours and shoving a tree branch up his ass are non-criminal actions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom