Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending herself

p0ink said:
if someone robs and assualts someone else, they deserve whatever they receive from the other person.

all this does is show how utterly stupid and retarded liberalism and gun control is.
I agree. Shooting a robber to prevent them from getting away with the loot is everybit as legitamate as shooting them fight before they take it.
 
p0ink said:
who cares if she shot him after the attack? the man beat the living shit out of her and robbed her.

normally, you might have a bit of a problem pulling a gun when you are being pummelled to death.

I guess you don't like dealing with FACTS.

She didn't pull the gun when she was pummelled to death, she shot him after the attack.

The law down here still differentiates between self-defence and revenge, if you have a problem telling the two apart then you really shouldn't qualify for owning a gun.
 
Tiervexx said:
I agree. Shooting a robber to prevent them from getting away with the loot is everybit as legitamate as shooting them fight before they take it.

legal in Texas
 
MAX 300 said:
I guess you don't like dealing with FACTS.

She didn't pull the gun when she was pummelled to death, she shot him after the attack.

The law down here still differentiates between self-defence and revenge, if you have a problem telling the two apart then you really shouldn't qualify for owning a gun.

that's the point! she couldnt pull a gun while she was being beaten to death. the second she could, she did.

and sorry, i dont have the brain-washed, liberal mindset you so obviously do. rights don't come from the government; government is supposed to get it's power from the consent of the governed, not the other way around.

keep on sucking the dick of the nanny-state, which you obviously love to do so much.
 
This is Australia, not Texas.

Do you think Australians in Australia should follow Australian law or Texan law?
 
MAX 300 said:
This is Australia, not Texas.

Do you think Australians in Australia should follow Australian law or Texan law?
They should change their laws, because I guarantee you the robbery rate has gone up since you stripped your country of the right to keep and bear arms. But in Texas its legal to carry a handgun concealed, and its made a positive impact on the amounts of robberies and criminals detered by the show of a legally carried handgun.
 
Re: Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending her

p0ink said:
who cares if she shot him after the attack?

The very definition of vigilantism. Enough of your idiocy, this isn't fucking Mad Max. You're not even holding a "conservative" viewpoint, it's an anarchistic one. Stop now, your argument is crumbling at an exponential rate.
 
Re: Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending her

Debaser said:
The very definition of vigilantism. Enough of your idiocy, this isn't fucking Mad Max. You're not even holding a "conservative" viewpoint, it's an anarchistic one. Stop now, your argument is crumbling at an exponential rate.

please explain to me how this is 'vigilantism' and 'anarchistic'

and no shit this isn't 'fucking mad max'. the lady did not wait a few days and then kill him. she killed him when she first got the chance.

so you're saying people can only try to defend themselves when they are actively being assualted/murdered. so once the perpetrator stops wailing on them, the victim must stop trying to defend themself that very instant.

and you want to punish her for defending herself....

you are a moron.
 
That is bullshit. She was hit hard enough with brassknuckles hard enough to fracture her skull and that isn't self-defense? WTF? He needed to be shot.
 
...she should get a medal.... and this is coming from me... a liberal.
 
Top Bottom