Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending herself

BodyByFinaplix said:
...she should get a medal.... and this is coming from me... a liberal.
Youre still in texas rob, which means you love guns!
 
superdave said:
Youre still in texas rob, which means you love guns!

Oh, guns are my only conservative view. I have a match-grade ar-15. LoL True, liberals in Texas are still often gun nutts.
 
p0ink said:
don't think this won't happen here in the US if many of the people in congress and democratic president nominees get their way with firearm legislation

OH bullshit. I doubt that story is even true the way it's written, probably everyone is investigated when someone is killed as they should be, I would imagine they will let her go when they learn all the facts of the case.
 
biteme said:
OH bullshit. I doubt that story is even true the way it's written, probably everyone is investigated when someone is killed as they should be, I would imagine they will let her go when they learn all the facts of the case.

oh yes, i forgot that skynews, of all people, is a propaganda mouthpiece for the NRA. :rolleyes:
 
We can't just kill everybody BBF, armed robbery and violent assault deserve harsh prison sentences not the death penalty.

Again, this woman did not kill in self-defence. This story was very big in the news here, after the incident she gave a long interview to a current affair show for $100,000 and she has since refused to talk to the police.

If she acted in self-defence she would have come clean to the police straight away, she was also filmed straight after the attack, she seemed to have very good recollection of the incident then and later in her TV interview. At the time she shot the armed robber, who had assaulted her, he was in the car trying to get away and clearly not posing a thread to her.

She is an armed and trained security guard, you can't tell me that she wouldn't know about shooting out car tyres instead of shooting the driver. As she fired the shot she was in the immediate vicinnity (sp?) of the car, but it was not coming or swirving towards her, in fact it's not actually clear if the robber had managed to get the car started.
 
Re: Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending her

p0ink said:
please explain to me how this is 'vigilantism' and 'anarchistic'

and no shit this isn't 'fucking mad max'. the lady did not wait a few days and then kill him. she killed him when she first got the chance.

so you're saying people can only try to defend themselves when they are actively being assualted/murdered. so once the perpetrator stops wailing on them, the victim must stop trying to defend themself that very instant.

and you want to punish her for defending herself....

you are a moron.

She shot him after it was clear that he was trying to escape the bungled robbery. THIS WASN'T DURING THE STRUGGLE--he was no longer a threat to her. She walked up to the car, and shot him. Revenge is revenge, it doesn't matter if she waited 3 minutes or 3 days before shooting him in cold blood.
 
p0ink said:
oh yes, i forgot that skynews, of all people, is a propaganda mouthpiece for the NRA. :rolleyes:

Poink for your info, I support the democratic party and I'm more on the liberal side. I guarantee you the majority of people (nearly all except for a few nut cases) would not put a person in jail for defending their life.
 
p0ink said:
if someone robs and assualts someone else, they deserve whatever they receive from the other person.

all this does is show how utterly stupid and retarded liberalism and gun control is.

Whatever. Self defence is the only excuse. Once they leave and you go after them and shoot them, that's revenge. Is it that complicated? Are you cop, judge, jury and executioner now all of a sudden?
 
Re: Despite almost being beaten to death, Woman charged with murder for defending her

Robert Jan said:
Once they leave and you go after them and shoot them, that's revenge. Is it that complicated?

Apparently it is for him. His "counterargument" equates to "nuh-uh, it was self-defense! LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU"
 
I'd give her no more than a slap on the wrists...probation...but not jail time.

When someone has assaulted you...and injured you...with a weapon no less, you damn well should fuck them up first chance you get. Was killing him a bit much? Sure it was....but, just a bit. More appropriate would have been to drag him out of the car and pistol-whip him til he had multiple facial and skull fractures to match her own...but you can see how that might have been a tad difficult.
 
Top Bottom