City of Chicago's gun ban....

[Becoming]

the government cannot deny any free man the right to bear arms.

but chicago has - isn't this municipal law unconstitutional? how can this be....

bullshit.

 

[-SD-]

Clearly the Federalist papers and other docs by the framers combined with the actual text of the constitution leave no question as to what the intent of the second amendment was.

 

[JKerry]

but chicago has - isn't this municipal law unconstitutional? how can this be....

bullshit.

no this municipal law is not unconstitutional. this has been challenged before and has gone to the supreme court. the court previously ruled in favor of the city.

 

[JKerry]

But how YOU feel isnt what matters. Its clearly stated what the law is.. that the government cannot deny any free man the right to bear arms.

And that organic bullshit is EXACTLY why things are so fucked up. People with that mindset mutate the constitution to what THEY want it to mean as opposed to what it was meant to be.. A STRICT limitation on the powers of government.

Its not a loose set of "guidelines" as you wish it to be. You dont like something.. "oh just change the constitution.. its organic" It doesnt work that way and until we cleanse our government of people who think that way.. this country will keep sprialing downward.

Jkerry you are not a liberal. You are a socialist. If you cannot accept our constituion by letter and spirit YOU NEED TO LEAVE.

you have a few things off in your organic interpretation. and as to me being a socialist... are you kidding? personally, i would love to have the ability to be armed as our troops are. but that doesn't mean i believe i have the right to...

 

[Becoming]

no this municipal law is not unconstitutional. this has been challenged before and has gone to the supreme court. the court previously ruled in favor of the city.

thats because of the fucked up interpretations of people that view things "organically"...

like seperation of church and state - it means no religion should be IMPOSED on you..... not that kids can't pray in school before a game if THEY CHOOSE to do so.... but it has not been interpreted that way because of "organic" and "PC" views....

we are no longer free.



when the colonies fought of the british, lets face it - they did it for selfish reasons - to throw off the burdens imposed by the british government... the king did not listen to their needs/demands so they fought for it....

they put that amendment in the bill of rights so that you would have the same ability if you were to find yourself in a similar situation.



what would you do if the government representatives voted to tax you 75% of your income tomorrow? what would you do? not vote for them next session? LOL! a clone will take his place next term regardless of how you vote. they don't care about what you want! the fact is you can do nothing.

what will you do when they come to take away all your belongings because you can't pay? write a letter? call the authorities? they are the authorities!
fight them with a can of mace and a baseball bat? LOL! they have automatic weapons and you will have none - good luck!



when they can no longer fear you fighting back there is no reason for the government to worry about what YOU want anymore. absolute power corrupts absolutely.