So coronary artery disease was apparently "non existen" before 1920.

[javaguru]

suppress half of life experiences...sounds like a good choice for the one life you have to live...

You do what you have to do to survive...



What is the parable..don't judge someone until you walked a mile in their shoes...

 

[redsamurai]

Or were you just bringing a random Internet claim to our collective attention?

ahhh, it was a subversive behind the back poo fling while i wasn't lookin...but right on, there's the plunk i know.

 

[mrplunkey]

ahhh, it was a subversive behind the back poo fling while i wasn't lookin...but right on, there's the plunk i know.

Was it specific if not random then? So what specific point were you making?

Was it from a source other than the internet? If so, what was the source?

Are you stating it is more than a claim? Are you standing behind it as a fact?

 

[redsamurai]

Was it specific if not random then? So what specific point were you making?

Was it from a source other than the internet? If so, what was the source?

Are you stating it is more than a claim? Are you standing behind it as a fact?

Given that I just read two articles, one from NEJM and the other from the Frank......ahh heck who am i kidding you don't care about all that, i should just poop in my hand and throw at you. Jeeerry jeeerry jjeeeeryy jjeeeeerrry

 

[TableFun]

Given that I just read two articles, one from NEJM and the other from the Frank......ahh heck who am i kidding you don't care about all that, i should just poop in my hand and throw at you. Jeeerry jeeerry jjeeeeryy jjeeeeerrry

url's or they dont exist

 

[mrplunkey]

Given that I just read two articles, one from NEJM and the other from the Frank......ahh heck who am i kidding you don't care about all that, i should just poop in my hand and throw at you. Jeeerry jeeerry jjeeeeryy jjeeeeerrry

O'Rlly?

I take both NEJM and JAMA. Shoot me a citation and I'll post-up excerpts of the article.

 

[TableFun]

University access to pubmed with linkout ftw

 

[mrplunkey]

University access to pubmed with linkout ftw

I'm really excited about reading his article. I can't believe I missed it first time around.

 

[jjtt]

I'm really excited about reading his article. I can't believe I missed it first time around.

Why don't you just read the one I posted?
Too easy?

 

[mrplunkey]

Why don't you just read the one I posted?
Too easy?

1) Because it's fun to watch redsamauri slowly be forced into admitting he didn't read any such article in the New England Journal of medicine.

2) You haven't been around long enough for me to pay much attention to anything you post.

3) Your first article was from 1966 and relied on retrospective data which in some cases doesn't even go past 1950. The author conveniently sidesteps the fact that we couldn't detect (or even document) coronary artery disease until well into the 20th century.

Now c'mon RS... post that NEJM link. Chris and I are dying to read it!