Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

why id prefer short cycles.....even though this may not mean nething to most of you

Its All Genetics

New member
i know diff people like to run their cycles diferent ways i.e. diferent compounds different lengths diff dosages


i think id rather stay on for 8 off for a month on for 8... i know pct should be 8 if ur on for 8 but i dont adhere to that rule and i know most of you on here dont either --dont lie!--

i hate the crash and coming off and if i had to deal with it for 2-3 months because i was on for 4-6 months straight i couldnt deal with it....


i just think its easier to gain and keep the gains by doing shorter cycles asopposed to long one with a long pct


jmho...case ne one else would like to share
 
I think you may have a point here.....although it all comes down to everyones own opinion.......but I personally like fast acting compounds because im too impatient for the longer ones such as EQ, which im on right now.
 
if u keep giving your body 4 weeks to return to normal test production every 8 weeks... is that enough? would that make somone infertile after cycling this way?
 
sweed said:
if u keep giving your body 4 weeks to return to normal test production every 8 weeks... is that enough? would that make somone infertile after cycling this way?


well i dont know about cycling but i was on for a year straight when my daughter was conceived and that was towards the latter end of the year...
 
I don't think you can make a hard and fast rule about this. I suspect that when you are young your body responds fairly quickly. But when you get older you need to use a longer cycle at a lower dose to get the body to change.

You know you young guys cum after a couple of pumps but us old guys need to really work at it. For two three hours or more. :heart:
 
Big_Joe said:
I don't think you can make a hard and fast rule about this. I suspect that when you are young your body responds fairly quickly. But when you get older you need to use a longer cycle at a lower dose to get the body to change.

You know you young guys cum after a couple of pumps but us old guys need to really work at it. For two three hours or more. :heart:


lmao you guys always manage to say something that makes me laugh so loud i wake the baby HAHA.....
 
Big_Joe said:
I don't think you can make a hard and fast rule about this. I suspect that when you are young your body responds fairly quickly. But when you get older you need to use a longer cycle at a lower dose to get the body to change.

You know you young guys cum after a couple of pumps but us old guys need to really work at it. For two three hours or more. :heart:
I was wondering if age had anything to do with responce to a cycle.Been doing 500mg.sust. and 300 mgs. deca and after 10 wks.have put on 0 lbs.I have to figure out if I should go another 10 with test -e or scrap it now.Quite frustrating for a 45 yr. old.
 
Re: why id prefer short cycles.....even though this may not mean nething to most of y

500 of Sust and 300 of Deca for 10 weeks and no gains? What's the problem? Diet, stress, bad gear?
 
Don't want to hijack this thread was just wondering about the age thing and making longer cycles to compensate.Every thing with mine was right on(exept weight gain)
 
Theres been a lot of discussion on short cycles in another forum I post on recently, one particular article by Paul Borrensen is particularly interesting, but we are talking 4 week cycles with high doses, not for the faint hearted! If you want a look, ill post the article up, its a good read!
 
Top Bottom