pjrnunes
New member
You are functioning under the assumption that this boy is even enrolled in some institution of higher learning somewhere.
But yes, your response is 100% correct, not that he would know that.
Definetely, we should not take him too seriously.
Anyhoo, talkin' about religious idiosyncrasies --- Would you be any surprised if these religious nutters dismiss any other religious books different than their own one?
What evidences does this boy seem to have to presume that his faith is prevalently superior and in accordance with the absolute truth?
Honestly, these are the folks who do take for granted the fact that they are today living in a democracy(not in a fundamentalist theocratic state) that allowed them the right to choose to believe and worship some supernatural power and superstitions since its fundation struggled by its very funding fathers.
Yet, they partly ignore a few of these fundamental principles conveniently to back seemingly pretty rules written in a dubious fairy-tale book 2,000 years ago in a region where many of their ancestors escaped 15 centuries later to find safe shelter in a land of *freedom*. What a freakin' dilemna --- What is more valid the law of the men or the law of God?
Don't you find it amusingly contradictory?