SO19 (Tactical Firearms Department of the Metropolitan Police - London) are only called out when required. It is the same around the rest of the UK.
There are armed response vehicles which routinely patrol cities, but it is not as if there are loads of trigger happy police running around brandishing guns at law abiding citizens.
The original article in this thread is misleading propoganda to try to say that gun control laws in the US should not be strengthened.
I do not know what the situation is regarding gun laws in the US (and I wouldn't presume to guess about them) but the article was talking total crap about the state of guns in the hands of police in the UK.
Of course gun crime is going up - I'm sure that it is rising in almost every country, along with drug-related crime.
The laws after Dunblane were meant to remove guns from being readily available. They would always be available to criminals. The guy who carried out the Dunblane massacre was a registered gun owner and hence after the post Dunblane laws, would not have been able to own guns - so Dunblane would not have happened.
There will always be gun crimes but the laws are also meant to stop the then legally-owned guns being used for killing.
There are armed response vehicles which routinely patrol cities, but it is not as if there are loads of trigger happy police running around brandishing guns at law abiding citizens.
The original article in this thread is misleading propoganda to try to say that gun control laws in the US should not be strengthened.
I do not know what the situation is regarding gun laws in the US (and I wouldn't presume to guess about them) but the article was talking total crap about the state of guns in the hands of police in the UK.
Of course gun crime is going up - I'm sure that it is rising in almost every country, along with drug-related crime.
The laws after Dunblane were meant to remove guns from being readily available. They would always be available to criminals. The guy who carried out the Dunblane massacre was a registered gun owner and hence after the post Dunblane laws, would not have been able to own guns - so Dunblane would not have happened.
There will always be gun crimes but the laws are also meant to stop the then legally-owned guns being used for killing.
Last edited: