Y'know, I'm mildly amused at your aggressiveness, but even more bewildered at your ignorance. In fact, I think its just a matter of NOT wanting to believe the facts.
Anyways, after reading the last reply, I started rifleing through papers and textbooks, ready to unleash more quotes and links than needed. But, I thought "Oh, wait, if he's smart guy, he'll know where to look."
But here's a few quotes for amusement purposes:
"An article that appeared on the Sept 9, 1992 issue of THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE [ 307:652-659 (1982)] states that when renal patients "with serum creatinine concentrations averaging 2.2 mg per decilitre (190 micromole per liter) were maintained on a diet containing 30 to 40 gm of protein per day and were phosphate-restricted, no significant fall in glomerular filtration rate was observed over two years, whereas continued deterioration of renal function characterizes comparable patients whose intake of protein and phosphorus is not restricted."
Ok, fairly self explanatory. Here one more:
"One study [AMERCIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASE 27(5):652-662 (1996)] compared kidney patients on a low protein diet (0.73gm/kg/day) with patients on a very low protein diet (0.66 gm/kg/day). It was concluded that for every 0.2 gm/kg/day of protein increase there was a 29% GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) decline associated with a 41% prolongation in the time before the patients experienced renal failure"
Now, here one YOU will like, liftsiron. This is where the controversy starts:
"The kind of dietary protein may also be important. Subjects fed 90 grams of meat protein daily showed a significantly greater increase in GFR (stress on the kidney) than was seen for subjects fed 90 grams of milk protein [CLIN. NEPHROL. 27(2):71-75 (1987)]. By contrast, a study with whey protein [NAHRUNG 42(1):12-15 (1998)] showed no significant effects on liver or kidney function."
So there you go, I even gave you a point