Fathers over the past have had little rights, which IS changing. Who the fvck do some of these mothers think they are?
The court systems only seem to want to know if you are paying Childsupport.
If a child is very young then there should NOT BE split custody.
If the child has been taken care of primarily by the mother then that is where the child SHOULD stay. Father's rights? Huh?
WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD?
Let me tell ya'll something in case you didn't know it - good mothers have been getting fucked out of ALL RIGHTS TO THEIR KIDS because of jackassholes who LOVE to manipulate the system.
And how would I know this?
Because I have been LIVING IT FOR 8 YEARS.
Guess what else?
The more brave I am to VOLUNTEER my situation, the more professional/normal mothers I meet who tell me THEY LIVED IT TOO.
When a father gets fucked out of custody everyone pats him on the back and says, "Poor guy got fucked."
When a mother gets fucked out of custody EVERYONE physically steps away and recoils with horror, "That low-life fucking piece of shit slut. Wonder what she did to get her kids taken away."
Ultimately - the only people who get fucked REGARDLESS of which parent gets fucked ARE THE CHILDREN.
In a perfect world children deserve a mother AND a father, but which one of us lives in a perfect world?
Any woman who would keep a child from their father *just because they can* (and not because they are truly protecting the child) should be shot as a mother should ALWAYS know better. Sadly, we almost EXPECT a father to use his children to fuck with their mother.... that doesn't seem to be the case here. I do believe that the thread starter only wants to be in the life of his child as HE SHOULD BE. But to post up and proliferate UTTER BUNK about "mother's OR father's rights" infuriates me.
It should ALWAYS be about the rights of THE CHILD.