coverguy
New member
anya said:Judging anomalies are not new, not even close. I've been to God knows how many comps, two World Championships, and the '96 Olympic all around finals. It's just part of the sport, doesnt happen all the time, but not real rare either.
Did you mean to type 9.8, 9.4, 9.1?
Nemov's exercise received a starting score of 10, I saw no visible errors while on the bar, with a single step forward on the landing, which is a .20 deduction. Considering he completed at least 2 skills that had never been done before, I think a fair score would be 9.80. He was still a 10 until he hit the mat. His adjusted score though was still lower than that. The Italian's exercise was a very different style, comparatively easier skills, but more flamboyant and with a stuck landing. I would have scored him in the high 9.8 range. Paul's routine was very clean, good landing, but admittedly less impressive than the other guys. I would have put him in the high 9.7 range. So I had it, a)Italy-gold, b)Russia-Silver, c)US-Bronze
At some point though scoring does become subjective. Placements become a matter of personal taste among the judges when two or more performances are both very clean.
I'm impressed, and i feel smarter. Thanks.