Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Splitting Arimidex Pills? Think again..

macrophage69alpha said:

Dosage necessary will vary considerably from one individual to another. If you have pre existing gyno (estrogenic) or estrogenic fat patterns you will need greater amounts of Arimidex than someone who does not. With higher Test and Dbol dosages- more is needed- how much .....?

peace


What would you consider an estrogenic fat pattern?


Rhino
 
I can see the smoke and I'm already feeling a little hot right now, but I have to say my piece on this. So get ready to flame. There are a ton of pills on the market that are already scored indicating you can take a half at a certain time, and the other at another time. Even pills that DO NOT have scores on them are dispensed by pharmacists with instructions to split the dosage. For example, if you want Viagra, 50mg will cost the same as 100mg at the pharmacy (not online discreet scripts). So you can ask your doctor to prescribe you the 100mg amount so that you can split it in two and save money. Same goes with generic Xanax, Valium, Proscar, Metformin, etc. etc. I've been to plenty of doctor's in my time (of course the doctors have been known to be wrong cliche' applies here), and any time I've ever had something prescribed that I wanted to save money on and split the dosage the doctor has always complied without hesitation. The pharmacists dispense some meds with inscriptions on the label reading take 1 and 1/2 pills in the morning and 1 and 1/2 pills before bed. This is on NON-SCORED products. I've used pills like this with no difference (noticable) in results so I have a hard time believing that Arimidex would be a different story. These are pharmacists and doctors, and I've never heard any even hint at a difference in efficacy when splitting a NON-SCORED tab in half. You could probably take this same theory and apply it to injectables. With the logic that you might be getting a blank you could argue that if you have a 5ml vial of test and use 2 cc's you could be ending up with 80% real product and the remaining 3 cc's would/could be the remaining 20% or "blanks." This doesn't seem to be the case however. This may be comparing apples to oranges though. Here's what's gonna get me flamed to hell and back. I think the Liquidex is most likely a great product. I've only heard one negative response about it on AF board. The overwhelming majority as well as respected vets have said it meets claims, is totally legit, and a great value for anastrozole. However, I think that this is turning in to a case where there is a hidden agenda here. I think that this product was introduced to the scene by very respected vets and constantly touted. This leads me to believe that there is some kind of financial interest in the product by those vets who relentlessly push it and claim it to be supperior to the tabs divided or not. Hey I'm 99% sure it's a great product but I wish that those who brought it to the scene would take some kind of credit for it and state whether they have any thing to gain by its introduction or popularity. Whether that be financial or free product gains. This seems to be like a MuscleMag not affiliated with MuscleTech type of scheme. If I'm wrong forgive me. However, I should add that as much as we love the mods and value their insight they aren't always infallable. Hence, Stroyer and Pipper (if anybody remembers that guy). I'm making NO accusations here. Things just don't add up with this theory though. Also, can somebody tell me how to change my ridiculous user name? It was pretty dumb to begin with and I can't take it anymore. later.
 
Top Bottom