KARMA THREAD>>>>The Jury is getting ready to give Casey Anthony justice FINALLY?

[brownbrown]

well I guess they shouldn't have overcharged her I guess if they didn't have the evidence

I don't understand why they couldn't get her on aggravated child assault

ME neither?!?!?!

 

[AFeedz]

Now let's bet on how quickly the Anthonys get divorced.

 

[Arabian]

Because there was no proof she committed aggravated child abuse. Even if the prosecution proved Caylee had been chloroformed, they didn't prove Casey did the chloroforming.

That is correct and when the judge gave the jury instructions he was clear as to there must be proof beyond a shadow of doubt to her guilt and they could not do that.

 

[cindylou]

Because there was no proof she committed aggravated child abuse. Even if the prosecution proved Caylee had been chloroformed, they didn't prove Casey did the chloroforming.

Was there not chloroform in her trunk? Did they not prove that Cindy perjured herself and did not do the internet searches for chloroform? Those searches came from their home computer and not because of the reason Cindy gave in her testimony.

 

[BlueBird]

Now let's bet on how quickly the Anthonys get divorced.

Might be a good thing, look at the vortex of shit that household created, liers/perjurers, cheaters, a killer.

 

[AFeedz]

That is correct and when the judge gave the jury instructions he was clear as to there must be proof beyond a shadow of doubt to her guilt and they could not do that.

Reasonable doubt doesn't mean jurors need to be 100% certain of their decision...just sayin.

 

[cindylou]

Now let's bet on how quickly the Anthonys get divorced.

I was thinking about that, how do you stay together after something like this

 

[Arabian]

Might be a good thing, look at the vortex of shit that household created, liers/perjurers, cheaters, a killer.

Damn right. They are the poster family for a DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILY

 

[BlueBird]

That is correct and when the judge gave the jury instructions he was clear as to there must be proof beyond a shadow of doubt to her guilt and they could not do that.

....

There can still be a doubt, but only to the extent that it would not affect a reasonable person's belief regarding whether or not the defendant is guilty. "The shadow of a doubt" is sometimes used interchangeably with reasonable doubt, but this extends beyond the latter, to the extent that it may be considered an impossible standard. Reasonable doubt is therefore used.

 

[Arabian]

Reasonable doubt doesn't mean jurors need to be 100% certain of their decision...just sayin.

I agree, no one is more shocked than I. She got away with COLD BLOODED MURDER