Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

KARMA THREAD>>>>The Jury is getting ready to give Casey Anthony justice FINALLY?

Damn right. They are the poster family for a DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILY

Not only that, but people will hate her for the rest of her life, just like they did on OJ.
This just puts a very bitter and sour taste in my mouth..
IMO, I never saw any type of remorse as you would for ones own. Just so sad for the precious little girl:rose:...


Shit pisses me off!!!!!
 
Was there not chloroform in her trunk? Did they not prove that Cindy perjured herself and did not do the internet searches for chloroform? Those searches came from their home computer and not because of the reason Cindy gave in her testimony.

They'd found out only one internet search for chloroform had been done, not 84 like originally stated. But searching for chloroform and proving someone acted on a search are two different things.

And they did supposedly find trace amounts of chloroform in her trunk, but they'd have to actually prove Casey used the chloroform on Caylee to get her on aggravated child abuse charges, which they didn't unfortunately.
 
Not only that, but people will hate her for the rest of her life, just like they did on OJ.
This just puts a very bitter and sour taste in my mouth..
IMO, I never saw any type of remorse as you would for ones own. Just so sad for the precious little girl:rose:...


Shit pisses me off!!!!!

No remorse at all, nothing not a thing was ever said about Caylee.
 
They'd found out only one internet search for chloroform had been done, not 84 like originally stated. But searching for chloroform and proving someone acted on a search are two different things.

And they did supposedly find trace amounts of chloroform in her trunk, but they'd have to actually prove Casey used the chloroform on Caylee to get her on aggravated child abuse charges, which they didn't unfortunately.

I think the prosecution thought they had an air tight case and screwed it up. They could have done more imo
 
I think the prosecution thought they had an air tight case and screwed it up. They could have done more imo

I doubt the prosecution thought that at all. And I believe they gave it 200% considering they even threw out the words 'death penalty'. You don't say that unless you plan on doing your best.

They couldn't have done more. There was nothing else to do. It's not the prosecution's fault there wasn't enough solid evidence to convict her.
 
Unbelievable , I can not wrap my mind around this

I wonder if the parents will sue her for making them look like the guilty people.

What really pisses me off is how a jury can see duct tape and a garbage bag that came from the house and still not find a person guilty. A minimum of aggrivated manslaughter.
 
I wonder if the parents will sue her for making them look like the guilty people.

What really pisses me off is how a jury can see duct tape and a garbage bag that came from the house and still not find a person guilty. A minimum of aggrivated manslaughter.

I know people are convicted with circumstantial evidence all the time.
 
I wonder if the parents will sue her for making them look like the guilty people.

What really pisses me off is how a jury can see duct tape and a garbage bag that came from the house and still not find a person guilty. A minimum of aggrivated manslaughter.

I personally think she's guilty.

However, having those objects in her possession unfortunately isn't enough to prove guilt. Those things were used on Caylee. And Casey/her family possessed those things, but what would need to be proved for a conviction is that Casey is the one who used those objects.
 
I personally think she's guilty.

However, having those objects in her possession unfortunately isn't enough to prove guilt. Those things were used on Caylee. And Casey/her family possessed those things, but what would need to be proved for a conviction is that Casey is the one who used those objects.

So pretty much you can have all the circumstantial evidence in the world but you have to have DNA, fingerprints or catch the crime on film to convict someone? Didn't she have a hair from a decomposing body in her trunk? Cadaver dogs and everything...the duct tape on the body, the garbage bag, the chloroform and the chloroform searches, Casey's behavior after her daughter went "missing"...Casey lying about the nanny...casey's general behavior..none of that was enough to convict her of ANYTHING? I have a hard time understanding what reasonable doubt means then...
 
Florida:
Git yer 15th trimester
bs_up.jpg

abortion, here!!!1
 
Top Bottom