K for an intriguing post.Hengst said:i can't believe the level of ignorance on this thread.......
1. Italians are caucasian
2. Caucasian refers to forensic differences, e.g. skeletal remains. There are 3 basic groups - Caucasian, Negroid, Oriental. and before any one jumps on me with the crappy we are all the same ...... there ARE physical, genetic differences between the groups. (ever wonder how science can determine if human remains are from a black, white or asian person when there is no soft tissue left behind?)
3. Arabs are considered caucasian as are Indians (India indians). American Indians are considered Oriental.
4. All white people are causcasians but not all caucasians are white.
5. As Mr DP points out adjacent populations mix so the boundries between these three groups is blurry where these groups meet. E.g. Central Asians are a mix of Oriental and Caucasian
6. The Human Being is a species, when people refer to 'race' thay are actually making reference to SUB-SPECIES. Caucasian, Negroid and Oriental are all sub-species of the human species. E.g. The CANINE is a species but the wolf, dingo and domestic dog are sub-species.
I do have a question about where Latino falls in here, the reason I ask is that you specifically mentioned American Indians, my father in law was pure Mohawk and needed a kidney transplant, he was actually on dialysis for 6 years because the genetic match was so difficult. His kidney eventually came from a Latino man from Texas. Now this is interesting, to me, on a purely (and admittedly, on my behalf, quite uneducated) academic level because Iroquois Indians have always been EASTERN woodland Indians (in fact his tribe is Canadian). I can't believe that a genetic match is a fluke ...