H
heatherrae
Guest
If you want to argue that they shouldn't be called myths if they are derived from eyewitness accounts, I have no problem with that. That really has nothing to do with my points. On the other hand, samoth very clearly has labeled all these creatures as myths.foreigngirl said:opinion is one thing. I have my opinion about what a law should mean and be, but you, as schooled on that subject, would know better and I would not even try to argue it with you. Because I realize that you went to college for that and that you know better than I do...on that subject. Just the same as me knowing more than you on myths and you should respect that fact and not try to prove me wrong and prove yourself right. Cuz I wouldnt do that to you on a subject that you went to school for.
What I just pointed out and it WAS ment for the thread starter - that it was the wrong term calling chupacabra, bigfoot etc mythological, cuz they are not.
On the rest of your posts here, I agree with you.
FG, I have studied other things besides law. Law is 3 years of graduate school. Undergraduate school was 4 years of liberal arts which is attended first.
If we made people have a college degree on here for every thread topic, this chatboard would get very quiet.