I am the author of this post that is on another board. I was informed that a little bit of it was posted over here. Some of the information is being lost because only a small portion was posted here...regardless. Someone asked me to post on my training theories over there after I posted on my cycling theories. I stated in the post the following..."its tough to talk about training on a message board. In real life or at my gym people will see me or someone I train and be convinced that my system works very well. And in person I can explain how it all fits together. But for some reason giving an opinion on training online offends alot of bodybuilders...its like a blow to their ego as if your putting them down or telling them they dont know how to train. And then you get every HIT, periodization, and brainwashed wieder principle disciple (etc, etc)arguing with me why their method is the best and I am wrong. So I usually refrain from it.
-if enough guys on this board are really curious and let me know --I'll write about my methods--
An owner of a very hardcore online magazine (Jason Muellar) is a very good friend, he has repeatedly asked me to write an A to Z on my system of training, supplementation, eating-the works. I'll probably do that sometime in the future.".
..........and bingo, I see alot of what I stated previously in this post. People get pissed if they think what they might be doing training wise is wrong or not the most productive. It's human nature. For the people who said they have done a routine like what I present-no you haven't and I can state that unequivocally because you only saw a small part of the post. I can continually turn 170lb guys (who go along with me 100%) into 260lb plus monsters over and over but I cannot help guys who are 190-230lbs who are stuck in their ways. They can continue to take the long road or never get there. So far Ive heard in this post (overtraining, undertraining, undervolume, CNS saturation). The guy who said that is not enough stimulation per workout has confused volume to equal gains. If volume = gains go head and do 100 hard sets per bodypart and do each bodypart once every 3 weeks. To me all this is a way to debunk another method because you dont want to believe what your presently doing is incorrect or 'slower gaining'. Noone is overtraining or undertraining that I train. Every person that I have trained has gained at least 47lbs. This sport is full of fragile egos, psuedo experts, armchair bicepcurlers. I am a very advanced bodybuilder but the only thing I am conceited about is I truly believe I could take anybody in this message forum and turn them into a 4.5lbs per inch bodybuilder. I love taking a humble bodybuilder who doubts his genetics and making him the largest guy in his gym. I love the people who whisper in the corners that "he must be loaded to the hilt" yet he is on the same things they are. I love hearing the petty jealousy and anger that comes over other bodybuilders now that the guy I trained is the big boy on the block. Im not pushing my methods on anyone--to each his own. But if you have been lifting for 4-5 years and people aren't commenting, stating or asking questions about you being a bodybuilder on a daily basis--I think thats embarrasing and you might want to question if what your doing has merit to it. I was asked not to post the link to the other board because they dont want alot of newbie bodybuilders over there--its an advanced crowd. (that is not meant as sarcasm, just what was asked of me)