Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

curling said:


Elaborate? Because I can see the relevance. And I would use that case as presedent for me prosecuting Durst on this matter.

"people there are no rules out there do what you want"

And that means you can go and rape someone? I don't think so. He never said "go and rape someone" but of course anything can happen at concerts, especially Limp Bizkit's cause only idiots would go listen to that fucking crap.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

curling said:


They definetly had something to do with. But ya'll aren't going to believe this but I was bullied a few times in school too and while I pointed a gun at them I didn't kill'em and I certainly didn't point a gun at anyone that wasn't involved like these dudes did and they were targeting Christians just like Manson does. It sure will be nice when aids kills him. I think he pure evil just bundy, hitler or any evil scum.

The point was you pointed a gun at people who bullied you. I had some trouble during my last year of high school and i was humilated badly for it. I am going to carry the scars from that for life and i can understand why someone would be willing to throw their life away to punish those who harassed them.

But they didn't even listen to manson. they listened to Rammstein.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/printer_friendly.asp?nid=8050

also, according to at least one person who saw the shootings who was later interviewed on tv, one of them pointed a gun at him, then recognized him as another outcast who was bullied by the jocks then pointed it somewhere else.

besides, this is an isolated incident. This is one school out of millions.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

nordstrom said:


The point was you pointed a gun at people who bullied you. I had some trouble during my last year of high school and i was humilated badly for it. I am going to carry the scars from that for life and i can understand why someone would be willing to throw their life away to punish those who harassed them.

But they didn't even listen to manson. they listened to Rammstein.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/printer_friendly.asp?nid=8050

Like I said if they would have just killed bullys I could almost see their point bullys suck and should be killed. But they kiled other students that did not bully them mainly students they knew were Christians. And that came from Manson. He has attacked Christians in many of his concerts and I have heard and seen clips of him saying this vile crap. He is pure evil. And if I was a DA I would go after that wierdo little freak with both barrels.
 
well then they were assholes. i dont know if that makes manson responsible.

in russia in 1900 (before the communist revolution) they used to ban books because the leaders were afraid ideas would lead to unrest. you're talking about the same thing, that ideas or music will lead to unrest so it should be banned. thats not going to happen.
 
nordstrom said:
well then they were assholes. i dont know if that makes manson responsible.

in russia in 1900 (before the communist revolution) they used to ban books because the leaders were afraid ideas would lead to unrest. you're talking about the same thing, that ideas or music will lead to unrest so it should be banned. thats not going to happen.

Don't think I am for censorship I am not. But I think you can say what you want to say but I think if you say something stupid or evil be prepared to pay the consequences. Durst had no reason to say what he did. It was stupid and totally irresponsible. And Manson makes money off the crap he says so he should pay the parents of kids that were killed damages for them losing their kids because of the nuts he makes money off him from saying his crap.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

curling said:


They definetly had something to do with. But ya'll aren't going to believe this but I was bullied a few times in school too and while I pointed a gun at them I didn't kill'em and I certainly didn't point a gun at anyone that wasn't involved like these dudes did and they were targeting Christians just like Manson does. It sure will be nice when aids kills him. I think he pure evil just bundy, hitler or any evil scum.

That is the dumbest statement I have ever heard from a self proclaimed Christian. You are no better than all the rapists and murderers and liars making a hate filled statement like that.

Those kids were stupid little children that couldn't hack it. Thousands of teenagers and kids get bullied daily in the U.S. alone, but they are hardly reaching for Molotov bombs, rifles, Uzis and hand guns, and I'm sure a significant number of them listen to Heavy Metal music.

Manson I one big gimmick. I laugh and piss my self howling at how he makes so much money selling his image, being a shock performer, and how all these idiots eat it up and take it seriously.

All those "Christians" that stand outside his concerts, clash with heavy metallers, hold up obscene banners filled with putrid hatred are scum. God, I seriously hate all you modern "Christians" and Catholics and your double standards and your bullshit ideologies. The only difference between you Christians and an Islamic suicide bomber is that you fight under a dfferent name. You're still hate filled, ignorant small little people.
 
curling said:
While he was on stage in front of a bunch of impressionable f' uped kids and people. He said "people there are no rules out there do what you want". Well numerous rapes happened and lots of violence and vandelism. One of the concert promoters thought it was one of dumbest things ever heard somebody say on stage. He said Fred Durst was stupid moron.

Well, if he said something so stupid and blatenly caused riots and rapes. Shouldn't he be held respondsible for what he did?

This is just plain dumb. Even if he had told them to go rape people he would have no responsibility. Everyone has the ability to ask themselves "should I really be doing this?”

Those dumb kids who decided to do it are the only ones responsible.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

curling said:


Like I said if they would have just killed bullys I could almost see their point bullys suck and should be killed. But they kiled other students that did not bully them mainly students they knew were Christians. And that came from Manson. He has attacked Christians in many of his concerts and I have heard and seen clips of him saying this vile crap. He is pure evil. And if I was a DA I would go after that wierdo little freak with both barrels.

Manson isn't evil. he is the one of the smartest entertainers on the face of the planet. Only a man like himself could create such a unique image which has made him a multi millionaire. He goes home to a mansion in bel air, filled with very tasteful art and furnishings, dresses like the majority of people, and does his own thng. He doesn't go home into a cellar and masturbate all over his faeces with images of Satan and Lucifer all over the walls and upside down crosses, slitting his wrists and sacrificing goats.

And those kids did not target Christians exclusively. What drivel.
 
Re: Re: Is Fred Durst Liable For the Rapes at Woodstock?

Tiervexx said:


This is just plain dumb. Even if he had told them to go rape people he would have no responsibility. Everyone has the ability to ask themselves "should I really be doing this?”

Those dumb kids who decided to do it are the only ones responsible.

Did you see that Jodie Foster movie or not?
 
Top Bottom