Fast Twitch Fiber
New member
The truth is NOBODY knows what they intended. The Constitution is constantly evolving with new legislation and Supreme Court decisions. The Constitution uses the generic term "arms" which would include anything from a sling shot to a nuke. Obviously it's not good for society to allow private ownership of nukes. Even James Nichols agreed with that (See "Bowling for Columbine"). So if we all agree that the constitution doesn't cover nukes, then that means that somewhere there exists a line between appropriate arms and inappropriate arms. It would therefore be up to Congress to decide where that line is drawn. Claiming the second amendment automatically gives you the right to any type of gun is a flawed argument unless you also believe that there should be no restrictions on any other types of weapons (nukes, mines, grenades, flamethrowers).