i dont mean be right in opinion or fairness arguements, but in stuff that is sequence of events, such as "you did that, then i did that, u did that, then i did that, so we are even" (thats just an example).
in situations where you cant just say "agree to disagree, its opinion", do you argue untill you get your point across or the other person backs down?
or do you make a neutral statement to shrug off caring?
or do you back down and let the person think they are right when they are clearly wrong and just makeing shit up and being a faggot?
in situations where you cant just say "agree to disagree, its opinion", do you argue untill you get your point across or the other person backs down?
or do you make a neutral statement to shrug off caring?
or do you back down and let the person think they are right when they are clearly wrong and just makeing shit up and being a faggot?