Outtlaw
New member
Diet has it's place, but it's not the only factor in determing gains. The type of drug you use does make a difference, but you seem to believe that all drugs are created equal, or at least close enough to where the difference in gains is only a mear pound or two.Joe Stenson said:You are forgetting "I" am the one saying diet is what matters, not your choice of drug. Like I said above, if you think var is going to cause an equivalent amount of bloat to deca, I am unsure why I am even continuing this debate.
That's your argument AND your assumption, and Im saying you're wrong if you think there wont be much difference in gains between a var cycle vs a test or deca cycle.Joe Stenson said:THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT THOUGH. If the guy on test isn't going to gain that much more than the guy on var, then many people would prefer to run the var because there are less sides. THAT is my argument. Your posts, as well as Mr. Grammar's, are implying that you feel the gains from test are going to be substantially greater. If that's not the case, then there is no argument to be had.
ex. Guy's maintenance calories = 4000
Guy is bulking so he consumes 5000 calories everyday
We're talking about the same guy, with the same genetics, doing the same training program. Is he really going to gain that much more off of test than var? I don't think so; you guys seem to. And if there is a large difference in muscle gained over the course of the cycle, did the extra sides make it worth it?
Did it ever occur to you that purhaps you might be WRONG about something, yet you keep trying to push your point on people to the point that it's agrivating them, and that's why people are bombing you??Joe Stenson said:And guys please, was the bombing really necessary? We've got a half decent debate going and then you go and do that. I suppose it would have been better if I just agreed with you both right off the bat. Elite would really be a great board if everyone kissed everyone else's ass and all agreed on everything.