1) Everyone has different goals. I personally don't aspire to look like the guy on the cover of GQ, but I'm not trying to be Ronnie Coleman either.
2) Saying it's not a good choice based on cost is assuming money is a limiting factor for everyone, which it clearly is not. If you had said, "var is a terrible choice when considering bang for your buck" then fine, but that's different.
3) Wanting to use drugs that can provide results, while limiting side effects, seems pretty intelligent to me. You obviously don't agree.
4) 35-40mg var, lol. THIS right here is why guys bash var. We're talking about one of the, if not the, mildest anabolics out there and you're running 280mg/week? Test is more potent and you're not running 280mg test/week now are you?
It's like the guys who bash Satch for running primo because it's so weak. Yeah, it's weak if you're running 300mg/week, but he's running a gram. Use some common sense people.