Alright, one night stand says shes having my kid and is asking for money...

[heatherrae]

The difference between men and women.

See, I wouldn't loan 280 bucks to someone who wouldn't sleep with me...lol.

that would include almost everyone...lol.

 

[redsamurai]

oh ok, there's a statute of limitations. How long is it by the way?

But I can see a court doing something funny with this........especially in a state like CA. If she can somehow prove that his actions be construed as knowing he's the father........than who knows. There've been funkier verdicts. Honest to god a few years ago a man sued an RV company because he wreked the RV. Sued the company because there was no EXPLICIT statement that the RV doesn't drive itself and you shouldn't get up from the drivers seat and walk back into the rear of the vehicle ALL THE WHILE driving down the highway at 60 mph. He got something out of the settlement.....I don't remember how much.............but the case has prompted vehicle makers to say in their handbooks that their vehicles are not safe if you're not behind the wheel while the car is in motion. See my point now?

No, you have the facts of the case confused.

What happened in that case was that he was married to the mother at the time and legally presumed to be the father unless he disputed it within the time of the statute of limitations. He got a divorce and then tried to come back after the time had elapsed to dispute paternity because he found out later that he was not the father.

The court decided that even though the facts were unfortunate, public policy was in favor of protecting the interest of the child in having a stable provider and enforcing the statute of limitations to bring the claim.

So far as I know, there has been NO CASE ever that a man was made to pay child support solely because he helped out a woman while she was pregnant.

 

[Raptorex]

that would include almost everyone...lol.

go to bed...and wake up and have that baby

 

[heatherrae]

oh ok, there's a statute of limitations. How long is it by the way?

But I can see a court doing something funny with this........especially in a state like CA. If she can somehow prove that his actions be construed as knowing he's the father........than who knows. There've been funkier verdicts. Honest to god a few years ago a man sued an RV company because he wreked the RV. Sued the company because there was no EXPLICIT statement that the RV doesn't drive itself and you shouldn't get up from the drivers seat and walk back into the rear of the vehicle ALL THE WHILE driving down the highway at 60 mph. He got something out of the settlement.....I don't remember how much.............but the case has prompted vehicle makers to say in their handbooks that their vehicles are not safe if you're not behind the wheel while the car is in motion. See my point now?

I could be mistaken but I think there was a case in Florida like that and one in Texas. I believe that in both states that they had a year to dispute paternity from the time of the divorce. However, I could be wrong.

It is weird but I did have a guy who came in to my office once with similar facts. He knew when the girl was prego that the baby was not his. She had broken up with the dad and he and her started dating. He wanted to marry her and be the baby's father. So, he signed the acknowledgment of paternity when the child was born. A couple of years passed and they broke up. He paid child support for a few years but they had some sort of fight and then he didn't want to pay anymore.

I told him that I thought his time had elapsed to dispute it but that I would have to look it up if he wanted to dispute it. I told him that if he successfully disputed paternity, though, that would mean that he would also have no right to visitation. I told him to go home and sleep on it and call me in the morning. Like clockwork, he called me and told me he didn't want to do it. Men seem to get really hung up on the money thing. Obviously, he still wanted to be the kid's father. It just took an honest lawyer who didn't just go after what he wanted to make a big fee to make him look at the big picture.

 

[blueta2]

funny how the most emotionally unhealthy women, are the ones defending her

Those are big words coming out of your mouth.
First off, you don't know me or anyone else here enough to assess that I or they are emotionally unhealthy. Second, I was not defending her actions, but I chose not to call a young girl with issues a whore.
Guys like you call women whores all the time and that's expected, but when I see other women call women names to degrade them, it ticks me off.
Defending other women does not make one emotionally unhealthy but you're obviously still too young to get that.
I thought u were MUCH smarter than this comment

 

[bw1]

Can some onr cook me breakfast, I'm hungry. Wake me up when it's done..thx

 

[TC2]

LOL...I love "Velvett"...she's (and a few others) a cool broad with actual logic.

 

[blueta2]

LOL...I love "Velvett"...she's (and a few others) a cool broad with actual logic.

She always has logic and she is very cool, but in this case you are agreeing with her b/c you're one of the biggest women haters on EF

 

[alien amp pharm]

LOL...I love "Velvett"...she's (and VERY FEW others) a cool broad with actual logic.

edited.


Too bad there isn't more like her.
Luckily I have a girl that's on par.

 

[blueta2]

edited.


Too bad there isn't more like her.
Luckily I have a girl that's on par.

Your penis is small isn't it?