Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

clomid or nolva/pct regimen

I didnt realise this was an inflamatory question... i asked him earlier not to say anything like that. but i cant control people... i do not have these powers...
But i just really wanted multiple opinions because even from mods nelson, iv recieved mixed opinions.... you need to realise how torn i am over making a decision lol?! lol....

nolva...
clomid..
nolva... + clomid?
hcg during? no after...
no just post cycleand unleashed + some nolvy...
nope...hcgenerate only bro!

after a while... my pct will legit look like this now ...

post cycle
phyto serms
unleashed
hcgenerate
sustain alpha
formastanzol
toco 8
bridge
clomid 50mg

how can you argue i never said either or i love the supps here.. im USING EM ALL!!! infact.. im kinda curious about low-prolac... you know i love u baby, so dont go thinking other guys are going to mislead my cracka ass. :D

It isn't an inflamatory question at all.

Listen, here's the deal...to everyone who's followed this thread...

I was one of the first people to write about the negative effects of clomid at a time when it was the standard. Over the years, my throries became accepted FOR NO OTHER REASON OTHER THAN THEY WERE CORRECT. It wasn't as if people believed my opinion. They found out for themselves.

I took a lot of shit for thinking outside of the box but I take pride that my findings have been proven and endorsed by many of the top people in the field.

I didn't just decide to sell some supplements. They were personally designed using the ingredients I found to be effective AFTER YEARS OF STUDY AND RESEARCH.

Now, a few people respond well to Clomid or Nolva. Great. They're lucky. But even they get better results with the recommended supps.

So a difference in approach is not a problem. What IS a problem is when someone comes on and says 'Oh no, drugs are best. You need to use drugs." Meanwhile, they don't know dick. They just read some bullshit information. Then they go on to say OTC products can't work. Of course, they never tried them.

Then to top it off they act imperious -- putting down people who disagree with them.

I've been down this road before. Years ago I was harassed by some dip shit who didn't even work out. I left the site. Once EF cleaned house, things have been great. But I'm not going to tolerate disrespect. Argue, disagree, debate, discuss ALL YOU WANT. But do not attempt to put me or any senior member down. That shit WILL NOT FLY.

And I said it before and I'll say it again. I've been in this industry for over 30 years. I don't know everything, but I'm not going to treated like some fucking noobie by some guy who just a couple of months ago was all fucked up because he didn't do a proper PCT.

I don't think that's asking too much.

Okay, I'm done. Topic over.
 
Nobody is saying there isn't a place for drugs. But that doesn't mean that all drugs are better than all non drugs.

And nobody has a problem with debate. But when people start throwing around terms like; "You're just ignorant" to senior members, that is way, way, way over the line.

And it's not because my feeling are hurt. I could give a fuck. But if one person does it, then another will, and before you know it, there's no mutual respect and the whole thing becomes a big pissing contest.

Me, and George and Rick and Needto and the other vets and mods have worked too hard to make this a great site. It took a long time and I can tell you right now, we're not about to let it turn back to flame-fests and shit talk.

What you are saying here is that the reason he was banned is because he called you ignorant. This is absolutely false because he didn't ever use this term until AFTER he was banned, so how can this be the reason? It doesn't make sense..

Nelson, you are very highly respected around here but doing something like this makes it look like there is no room for debate on a back and forth basis. You say that there is tolerance for debate, but I don't believe this is true or this member would not be banned.

This is the last post I will make regarding this subject. If this post is breaking any rules then please delete. Thank you
 
What you are saying here is that the reason he was banned is because he called you ignorant. This is absolutely false because he didn't ever use this term until AFTER he was banned, so how can this be the reason? It doesn't make sense..

Nelson, you are very highly respected around here but doing something like this makes it look like there is no room for debate on a back and forth basis. You say that there is tolerance for debate, but I don't believe this is true or this member would not be banned.

This is the last post I will make regarding this subject. If this post is breaking any rules then please delete. Thank you


First of all, I didn't ban anyone. I actually don't have any mod powers.

Secondly, the guy was being antogonistic, was warned, and ramped up the nastiness.

If he had a legit argument, he could have made it. Instead he decided to start being insulting. And that's probably the reason he was banned. You'll have to ask Rick or Needto about that.

I'm sorry this happened. I'm never happy when someone is banned. I would have been happy to debate him. But he took it away from the topic and made it personal and EVEN IF HE WAS RIGHT, that would not be acceptable. But he wasn't.
 
Now that thats all said and done, lets all take a step back and cool off.
 
This will be my last post regarding this topic. There are just some things that need to be said. I'm sure this account will get banned, just like the others.

1. I was never antagonistic towards you Nelson, you hurled the first insult by calling me "way out of my league." You even edited your post to make it say "way off base" a little while later instead. You can still see your original response in my quotes however.

2. You said you would love to have a debate with me? That was exactly what was happening. Anyone can read this thread and see that that is ALL I was trying to do, yet, you never debated. You basically insisted you were right and I was wrong - but you never posted any proof - NOTHING. Using the quote "I've been doing this 30+ years" is simply a fallacy.

If you really wrote 100s of articles on the subject of PCT, you should have had no problem showing us a single article - just one. You never explained the mechanisms by which your products work. You just say they work. I wanted to know HOW they work. What I was doing during this whole debacle was explaining how SERMs work and why HCG shouldn't be used during PCT. If you had an opposing theory, you should have shared it with us. Instead all you did was say I was wrong and you were right. If you wrote an artcile, cut & paste it here. Send me a link to it. Anything!

3. Compared to the way some others have acted on this board, I was never "nasty" with you. I never tossed a swear word or direct insult at you. I may have said your position on something was ignorant, but this was simply in response to your own ego driven demeanor. We get it, you're a senior member of the board and demand respect. Even though you talk about mutual respect in a previous post, you don't actually follow that practice. It is basically your way or the highway. I can understand the position of not wanting to let things get out of hand, but seriously, were they really getting out of hand to the point where other members would be influenced to the point of board anarchy?

4. I never said your products were inferior and I never insisted that drugs were better - all I insisided on was that they were PROVEN. There are many natural substances that are practically pharmacological and perhaps you guys have formulated something that is powerful enough to do what you claim. When the thread got derailed, and the conversation moved towards simply QUESTIONING your products and the mechanisms by which they work, you considered this insulting. Sure I implied there were financial motives behind the push for these products, but this was obvious to anyone. It is even more questionable now because you refuse to explain how the ingredients in your products synergistically work for men with AAS induced suppression (aquired secondary hypogonadsim).

5. Years ago I had a fucked up cycle / no PCT because of my federal bust, which I shared with everyone on this board in the hopes that it might help some avoid the same mistakes I made. I hastily jumped on TRT because I had to do everything through a doctor (I didn't even want to order a SERM out of legal fear). I immersed myself in the subject of (male) hormones, AAS, and recovery for many years, and still do today. To bring up my shutdown due to this just to back up your argument is another fallacy, it really doesn't make you right and again, you decide to use something out of context just to make yourself appear more knowledgable on the subject. Perhaps you've never made a mistake.

One thing to clarify, I'm not saying you don't know what you're talking about and I am the authority. All I have been doing is asking questions.

To C.K. that posted, "why use clomid even though it killed your libido and why not use products like HCGenerate to recover." Maybe I would, if someone would explain to me how it works to promote recovery and why it would be better than using something like clomid alone, or even in combination with a SERM. Does it actually help you recover or does it just make you feel better through some other mechanism while your body is attempting to recover at its own pace. How long can your body respond to these natural compounds before results begin tapering. These are valid questions.

For example, one of the ingredients in HCGenerate, Divanillyltetrahydrofuran, doesn't directly raise testosterone. It simply binds to SHBG allowing more of your own testosterone to be unbound (Free). This isn't recovery from suppression though it might help you feel better with low test levels.

What ingredient increases GnRH signaling or increases natural LH output from the pituitary? That is the goal of HPTA recovery; to get LH output going again and allow your body to reach a sustainable equilibrium. Studies show that 100% of participants using SERMs achieved an increase in LH through GnRH signaling. This is undeniable. Once you taper off of a SERM it is up to your body to maintain a reasonable balance.

Is it wrong to ask how this is achieved with your product?

6. You say wrote an article about the negative effects of clomid a long time ago. Where is this article? Can we read it? I never disagreed with you on the negative sides of clomid. I am right there with you in agreement that the sides are shitty for many of us. The question is, what was your alternative therapy? If it was just HCG, can you explain how HCG can stimulate a desirable brain / pituitary response in regards to recovery?

7. Lastly, I offered an apology to you for any offense you might have taken and it still stands. I know you didn't ban me, but I hope you can take a step back and realize all I was doing was asking questions and asserting my points with reasonable evidence. I (and I'm sure several others) wonder why you (or whoever banned me) were hesitant to do the same.

I don't expect for my original account to be reactivated and this one will probably be banned too - for simply debating and asking how.
 
This will be my last post regarding this topic. There are just some things that need to be said. I'm sure this account will get banned, just like the others.

1. I was never antagonistic towards you Nelson, you hurled the first insult by calling me "way out of my league." You even edited your post to make it say "way off base" a little while later instead. You can still see your original response in my quotes however.

2. You said you would love to have a debate with me? That was exactly what was happening. Anyone can read this thread and see that that is ALL I was trying to do, yet, you never debated. You basically insisted you were right and I was wrong - but you never posted any proof - NOTHING. Using the quote "I've been doing this 30+ years" is simply a fallacy.

If you really wrote 100s of articles on the subject of PCT, you should have had no problem showing us a single article - just one. You never explained the mechanisms by which your products work. You just say they work. I wanted to know HOW they work. What I was doing during this whole debacle was explaining how SERMs work and why HCG shouldn't be used during PCT. If you had an opposing theory, you should have shared it with us. Instead all you did was say I was wrong and you were right. If you wrote an artcile, cut & paste it here. Send me a link to it. Anything!

3. Compared to the way some others have acted on this board, I was never "nasty" with you. I never tossed a swear word or direct insult at you. I may have said your position on something was ignorant, but this was simply in response to your own ego driven demeanor. We get it, you're a senior member of the board and demand respect. Even though you talk about mutual respect in a previous post, you don't actually follow that practice. It is basically your way or the highway. I can understand the position of not wanting to let things get out of hand, but seriously, were they really getting out of hand to the point where other members would be influenced to the point of board anarchy?

4. I never said your products were inferior and I never insisted that drugs were better - all I insisided on was that they were PROVEN. There are many natural substances that are practically pharmacological and perhaps you guys have formulated something that is powerful enough to do what you claim. When the thread got derailed, and the conversation moved towards simply QUESTIONING your products and the mechanisms by which they work, you considered this insulting. Sure I implied there were financial motives behind the push for these products, but this was obvious to anyone. It is even more questionable now because you refuse to explain how the ingredients in your products synergistically work for men with AAS induced suppression (aquired secondary hypogonadsim).

5. Years ago I had a fucked up cycle / no PCT because of my federal bust, which I shared with everyone on this board in the hopes that it might help some avoid the same mistakes I made. I hastily jumped on TRT because I had to do everything through a doctor (I didn't even want to order a SERM out of legal fear). I immersed myself in the subject of (male) hormones, AAS, and recovery for many years, and still do today. To bring up my shutdown due to this just to back up your argument is another fallacy, it really doesn't make you right and again, you decide to use something out of context just to make yourself appear more knowledgable on the subject. Perhaps you've never made a mistake.

One thing to clarify, I'm not saying you don't know what you're talking about and I am the authority. All I have been doing is asking questions.

To C.K. that posted, "why use clomid even though it killed your libido and why not use products like HCGenerate to recover." Maybe I would, if someone would explain to me how it works to promote recovery and why it would be better than using something like clomid alone, or even in combination with a SERM. Does it actually help you recover or does it just make you feel better through some other mechanism while your body is attempting to recover at its own pace. How long can your body respond to these natural compounds before results begin tapering. These are valid questions.

For example, one of the ingredients in HCGenerate, Divanillyltetrahydrofuran, doesn't directly raise testosterone. It simply binds to SHBG allowing more of your own testosterone to be unbound (Free). This isn't recovery from suppression though it might help you feel better with low test levels.

What ingredient increases GnRH signaling or increases natural LH output from the pituitary? That is the goal of HPTA recovery; to get LH output going again and allow your body to reach a sustainable equilibrium. Studies show that 100% of participants using SERMs achieved an increase in LH through GnRH signaling. This is undeniable. Once you taper off of a SERM it is up to your body to maintain a reasonable balance.

Is it wrong to ask how this is achieved with your product?

6. You say wrote an article about the negative effects of clomid a long time ago. Where is this article? Can we read it? I never disagreed with you on the negative sides of clomid. I am right there with you in agreement that the sides are shitty for many of us. The question is, what was your alternative therapy? If it was just HCG, can you explain how HCG can stimulate a desirable brain / pituitary response in regards to recovery?

7. Lastly, I offered an apology to you for any offense you might have taken and it still stands. I know you didn't ban me, but I hope you can take a step back and realize all I was doing was asking questions and asserting my points with reasonable evidence. I (and I'm sure several others) wonder why you (or whoever banned me) were hesitant to do the same.

I don't expect for my original account to be reactivated and this one will probably be banned too - for simply debating and asking how.






I'm not going to go through each thing piece by piece again.

One thing I will address is when you say SHOW ME ONE ARTICE. It's antagonistic. You think I'm lying to you?

Anyone who's been around for a while is familiar with my work with the various magazine, websites and my books. They know of my work with Dan Duchaine and the various doctors and pro bodybuilders I've interviewed. You can do a google search. By challenging me in a belligerent way you not only set a bad precident but you show your lack of knowledge. And that's not an opinion. My work is verified.

Now that alone doesn't make me automatically right. But when you talk to someone with cred like they're some kid who needs to prove their credentials to you because you're unaware of them, THE LEAST, you can do is to do it in a non insulting manner. You consistently made claims about how your research was correct and refused to listen to why it wasn't.

Look, I don't want you banned, but I think it's important to see where this went wrong.

As far as I'm concerned it's over. Things got off on a bad foot and that happens. I'm okay with you staying. I just hope the intent here is understood.
 
Beating a dead horse here... everyone said the discussion was over... shoulda been over the first thread you and nelson had this argument and got nowhere... just give it a break if clomid works for you great for most of us here we've found better otc pcts with less sides
 
It wasn't me,everyone has a right to an opinion.but my opinion is clomid sucks and HCGenerate blows it away!
 
I'm not going to go through each thing piece by piece again.

One thing I will address is when you say SHOW ME ONE ARTICE. It's antagonistic. You think I'm lying to you?

Anyone who's been around for a while is familiar with my work with the various magazine, websites and my books. They know of my work with Dan Duchaine and the various doctors and pro bodybuilders I've interviewed. You can do a google search. By challenging me in a belligerent way you not only set a bad precident but you show your lack of knowledge. And that's not an opinion. My work is verified.

Now that alone doesn't make me automatically right. But when you talk to someone with cred like they're some kid who needs to prove their credentials to you because you're unaware of them, THE LEAST, you can do is to do it in a non insulting manner. You consistently made claims about how your research was correct and refused to listen to why it wasn't.

Look, I don't want you banned, but I think it's important to see where this went wrong.

As far as I'm concerned it's over. Things got off on a bad foot and that happens. I'm okay with you staying. I just hope the intent here is understood.

I agree, things got off on the wrong foot and things just got out of hand. I never meant to insult you (or anyone for that matter) or be antagonistic by asking you to show me an article, I honestly just wanted to see one so I could try to understand your point of view, that is all.

In any case, we're done here. We can respectfully agree to disagree on this particular subject.

Have a good one.
 
Top Bottom