why are prohormones considered "worse"

[eddymerckx]

from what i understand about prohormones is that they are made up of a larger percentage of molecules that have a methyl 17a by weight when compared with other "traditional" oral steroid and are therefore significantly more hepatoxic...but what the hell do i know

 

[the_alcatraz]

from what i understand about prohormones is that they are made up of a larger percentage of molecules that have a methyl 17a by weight when compared with other "traditional" oral steroid and are therefore significantly more hepatoxic...but what the hell do i know

I'd say quite a LOT

 

[Pikaberdot]

There's been research regarding most AAS. Both on humans and animal subjects. Not so much when it comes to prohormones. So the overall lack of research, in combination with the fact that you get the same (or worse) side effects, and less results are why they are considered "worse".

 

[Varga]

Not sure how well these newer prohormons work but the ones from few years ago around when M1T was around were strong as fuck....I remember the turanabol by Gaspari being amazing for strength at only 15mg ED if I remember right.
I started mixing that with test prop and holy shit

 

[chazk]

I do agree with ross on one thing that superdrol is potent stuff.
I watched two work out partners in my gym do a cycle run to see if the superdrol worked.

Keep in mind they both were pretty thick and worked out alot and have juiced in the past.
Both of them started to look bloated in the face and told me they both shot up around 7lbs in 6 weeks , they both told me it was just as good as dbol but less bloat.

I ventured away from the stuff being that I really do not even like orals due to liver side effects.

But of someone wants to run a oral does not care superdrol is worth the money for them if they do not want to try and find dianabol

 

[eddymerckx]

I do agree with ross on one thing that superdrol is potent stuff.
I watched two work out partners in my gym do a cycle run to see if the superdrol worked.

Keep in mind they both were pretty thick and worked out alot and have juiced in the past.
Both of them started to look bloated in the face and told me they both shot up around 7lbs in 6 weeks , they both told me it was just as good as dbol but less bloat.

I ventured away from the stuff being that I really do not even like orals due to liver side effects.

But of someone wants to run a oral does not care superdrol is worth the money for them if they do not want to try and find dianabol

i agree-there are no surprises with d-bol----there is so much information about real gear, why be the crash test (no pun intended) dummy for something new---heck, you don't even buy a car during the first model year and it can takes years of use by million of people to find-out about unintended sides of the lastest and greatest drug.......i am just waiting for the study that cialis will make my pecker fall off after 5 years

 

[wzkid]

i am just waiting for the study that cialis will make my pecker fall off after 5 years

Oh Shit,

 

[OMEGA]

I have not read any posts only the title of this thread

~ many or poorer forms of superior steroids
~ some are not even close to Steroids yet have sides
~ Risk: many of them have no research of the side effects, and possible other pointer usually associated with the researched forms.

 

[Mavafanculo]

traditional steroids have either a long track record or lots of studys behind them, so we have some idea of long-term sides and safety issues.

prohormones/prosteroids/designer steroids fall into 2 catagories:

1) designed on monday, tested for a month, and on the shelf next month. so you have no idea what the intermediate and longterm effects will be.

2) copys of steroids that were tested and rejected by drug companies for either effectiveness or safety reasons.

 

[OMEGA]

Mava with teh win