why are prohormones considered "worse"

[the_alcatraz]

traditional steroids have either a long track record or lots of studys behind them, so we have some idea of long-term sides and safety issues.

prohormones/prosteroids/designer steroids fall into 2 catagories:

1) designed on monday, tested for a month, and on the shelf next month. so you have no idea what the intermediate and longterm effects will be.

2) copys of steroids that were tested and rejected by drug companies for either effectiveness or safety reasons.

sek-c Mava strikes again!

 

[TexasBB]

my experience- i ran some M1T and MAG10 3-4 years ago and made amazing strength and size gains. i had never used any steroids prior to that. since then i have run a few true aas cycles but have yet to realize the same gains. but, and it is a big but, while taking prohormones my liver took a beating, gyno was a problem and acne was brutal (same with aas). i wouldn't touch prohormones just for the liver damage.

 

[ironcheif1984]

Prohormones such as the original 1-AD and 4-AD, as well as the new "designer steroids" such as Halodrol, Superdrol, and Epistane, are no "better" or "worse" than the classical anabolic steroids such as Dianabol and Deca that are available on the pharmaceutical/underground market.

However, they are frequently referred to as "worse" than the classical anabolic steroids because they are often times LESS EFFECTIVE, but still produce some of the very same side-effects. Like 19-Norandro for instance, which is highly progestational and severely suppressive of the HPTA, while being significantly LESS effective than it's parent hormone, Nandrolone(Deca).

It should be noted however, that the new designer steroids such as Superdrol and Epistane are actually just as effective as other oral steroids such as Dianabol, Winstrol, or Anavar.

Kinda hard to beileve.

 

[P4D2A022]

SD does def work. havent tried epistane but have heard awesome things...superdrol's lethargy just blowssss

 

[bigdofba]

Is epistane underdosed? I read an article somewhere that and supposedly someone tested it and found that the ingredients weren't what the lable said.

I am very interested in trying epistane or havoc even though everyone tends to bash prohormones.

 

[Varga]

my experience- i ran some M1T and MAG10 3-4 years ago and made amazing strength and size gains. i had never used any steroids prior to that. since then i have run a few true aas cycles but have yet to realize the same gains. but, and it is a big but, while taking prohormones my liver took a beating, gyno was a problem and acne was brutal (same with aas). i wouldn't touch prohormones just for the liver damage.

From experience M1T was the only steroid which started to give me gyno. Never had gyno issue before or after.....that basically tells me that the stuff was extremly powerful. From what I remember gains were very rapid about 3 weeks and you pretty much done
I have to agree that it would pound the heck out of you body but the shit was very strong and you definitely got results. Mag 10 was milder in sides but put on nice mass as well.
This shit wasn't for the fainth of heart that's for sure!! LOL

 

[P4D2A022]

i ran m1t at 15mg for about 5-6 days and oculdnt handle it. and ive done 40-40-40 of superdrol before... i only ran m1t that one time. i think my stuff may have been overdosed, i dunno. maybe it just didnt agree w me

 

[jumpmaster82]

the sides are considered worse because the sides are the same if not worse than aas and give half the gains.