New anabolic gyno reducer

[lanky]

Funny how lots of bros on boards sponsored by the makers of the product often get good results from it...

exactly,,then when i try the products it does not work...to many products for me to name from the AM and BB.com forum

 

[Mr. Matt]

I just thought I'd share my experience with it so far. Like I said, I have no idea about how this product affects gyno personally, so I am not recommending it for that. If I had gyno, I might try this, but after using tried and true methods first. For a newer oral it ain't bad. Definitely would need PCT afterwards with a SERM.

 

[redsamurai]

did they push their products? yes.......were they knowledgable about alot of endocinological processes and how certain compounds or certain classes of compounds can behave in the human body....yes as well. So there was give and take........I think we got more than they took. Not everything was about what anafit was selling. And you personally had a very longstanding beef with them.......

More likely than not, the people promoting it work for the company who produces it. Ulter and Macro would likely just say "use AIFM instead".

Lets be realistic about what's going on here and what has gone on in the past.

 

[Muscleaddict]

Pity so little is known about this drug and its parent compound. IBE could have done more to get some solid info. They dont even know the half life of Epistane. The following information from NCI (National Cancer Institute) on Epitiostanol I found quite interesting.

According to NCI's biological activity spectrum predictions Epitiostanol scores higher than Tamoxifen as an Estrogen Antagonist (0.975 vs. 0.844) and scores 0.977 as an androgen agonist and 0.969 as an anabolic which are higher than scores for dianabol, deca and winstrol. That must be worth something.

Yes epistane is methyl-Epitiostanol and obviously adding a 17a methyl to Epitiostanol would change its characteristics somewhat but judging from other steroids but it would still be similarly anabolic and probably more if not as androgenic.

http://129.43.27.140/ncidb2/ -NCI Database Browser.

 

[Anthony Roberts]

did they push their products? yes.......were they knowledgable about alot of endocinological processes and how certain compounds or certain classes of compounds can behave in the human body....yes as well. So there was give and take........I think we got more than they took. Not everything was about what anafit was selling. And you personally had a very longstanding beef with them.......

As a matter of fact, I didn't have a long standing beef with them. Their board was the first one I was a member of, ever. I've known them for about 5 years, actually, all of which we were friendly. I had no beef with them at all until I was a member here, and committed the heresy of questioning one of their products. At that point, my posts were edited and deleted, and they personally attacked me.

You can see what I'm talking about in this thread where I didn't attack them at all personally, and they attacked me personally, professionally, etc:

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=442485&page=6&pp=20&highlight=rugby

Which is basically how I now view them; as a result of their actions in this thread. Give it a read and let me know if I'm wrong.

 

[truckdaddy]

I would do pct after taking it bro.

i did, i ran nolva for 3 weeks

 

[needtogetaas]

i did, i ran nolva for 3 weeks

could run derma after using some thing like this to.