Do any of you buy into the theory that chest exercises such as the incline press or dunbbell flyes are a waste of time? I have always included dumbbell flyes and bb/db incline presses into my chest routine, but I have read a lot of opinions as of late that these exercises can be outright scrapped.
The basic premise is that the more weight you put up, the bigger your muscle grows (obviously). So with flyes you have to drop the weight dramatically, and the actual movement makes the exercise an isolation movement (therefore eliminating other muscle groups that would help in getting more weight up). I always thought that the flyes were for shaping the outer chest, however its now generally accepted that you can not change the shape of your muscles - you can only make then bigger. Wouldn't that then pretty much make flyes worthless or am I missing something?
As for the incline presses, it again requires that you decrease the amount of weight that you use. The popular opinion here (myself included) was that this exercise increased the size of your upper chest, but I have read in many places that you can not isolate one part of the chest from the other. It's all one large muscle. If that is a fact, then it seems that incline presses would be reduced to nothing more than a waste of energy and that we should focus entirely on flat bench presses, decline presses, and dips.
Thoughts?
The basic premise is that the more weight you put up, the bigger your muscle grows (obviously). So with flyes you have to drop the weight dramatically, and the actual movement makes the exercise an isolation movement (therefore eliminating other muscle groups that would help in getting more weight up). I always thought that the flyes were for shaping the outer chest, however its now generally accepted that you can not change the shape of your muscles - you can only make then bigger. Wouldn't that then pretty much make flyes worthless or am I missing something?
As for the incline presses, it again requires that you decrease the amount of weight that you use. The popular opinion here (myself included) was that this exercise increased the size of your upper chest, but I have read in many places that you can not isolate one part of the chest from the other. It's all one large muscle. If that is a fact, then it seems that incline presses would be reduced to nothing more than a waste of energy and that we should focus entirely on flat bench presses, decline presses, and dips.
Thoughts?