Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Do you believe in Mythical Creatures such as:

heatherrae said:
:lmao: I "don't read good?" I won't even explain to you the irony of that.

I never said that there are not myths in literature.

I've never debated with anyone worse at it than you, no offense.
You cant debate something that you are not familiar with. And you cant debate facts.

heatherrae said:
Read the definition of literature and get back to me next week. Seriously, i don't care anymore...LOL.
why dont you shut off your computer and start reading something that just might get you to understand something and then you call me? Mmmmkay? Dont tell me what to do and dont present yourself as more-knowing than me, cuz you are just not. Admit it, say, "okay, maybe I do have to read up on it" and call it a day
 
heatherrae said:
:lmao: I "don't read good?" I won't even explain to you the irony of that.

I never said that there are not myths in literature.

I've never debated with anyone worse at it than you, no offense.
your a cunt, simply put. i cant believe you could even think to expect others to respect you when you treat other's this way. you must have the crazy mother gene, i can get you my mom's therapist if you need it.


also, isnt FOREIGNgirl's first language not english? how many languages have you mastered again, heatherrae?
 
foreigngirl said:
Now its only about if mythology falls under literature. She feels she is right. I know I am right, cuz I majored in literature and had extensive studies on mythology and folklor. If those were not relevant to literature, they would have been just mentioned. We wouldnt have to spend 2 semestars studying myths and folklor as 2 separate subjects. She still feels that she know more tham me, even though she hasnt done nearly in-depth study as I have. So, the expert (me) doesnt know shit, cuz the random person (HR) has to be above all
well be careful calling yourself an expert even after studying for 2 whole semesters.

you two are clearly referring to two separate definitions of the word, MYTH. This is what's causing your arguments.
Heather is using her interpretation of the word myth as the layman's version and saying that something can be referred to as a "myth" but not be written in text anywhere, and therefore not in written literature. but again, this version of the word "myth" seems to be different than the word "myth" you are referring to.
you are referring to the textbook definition because that is the actual true definition and one that you studied.

brb sloppy joes are done cookin
 
JumpBallWinner said:
The loch ness creature has been given a name in science, " Nessiteras Rhombopteryx"

So is it allowed to exist now?

That's just latin nomenclature. I can define a nomenclature x, where x = whatever I want it to. That doesn't mean it exists, or that it's science. Only that I gave it a name.



:cow:
 
SublimeZM said:
your a cunt, simply put. i cant believe you could even think to expect others to respect you when you treat other's this way. you must have the crazy mother gene, i can get you my mom's therapist if you need it.


also, isnt FOREIGNgirl's first language not english? how many languages have you mastered again, heatherrae?
:rolleyes:

Why don't you try reading as well. I've been patiently posting definitions to a lady who called me "stupid" etc.

sorry if I have not patience for either of you, anymore.

If you want to write to Random house and tell them that their definitions are incorrect, go ahead.

Frankly, I couldn't give a flip whether a 19 year old boy who didn't read the thread wants to call me names.
 
Smurfy said:
well be careful calling yourself an expert even after studying for 2 whole semesters.

you two are clearly referring to two separate definitions of the word, MYTH. This is what's causing your arguments.
Heather is using her interpretation of the word myth as the layman's version and saying that something can be referred to as a "myth" but not be written in text anywhere, and therefore not in written literature. but again, this version of the word "myth" seems to be different than the word "myth" you are referring to.
you are referring to the textbook definition because that is the actual true definition and one that you studied.

brb sloppy joes are done cookin

Kai have one? :qt:
 
Smurfy said:
you two are clearly referring to two separate definitions of the word, MYTH. This is what's causing your arguments.

HEY! Stop that! We have to have something to argue here, and recognizing that we're arguing from different POV's isn't going to do anything but bring this thread to a screeching halt.



:cow:
 
Smurfy said:
well be careful calling yourself an expert even after studying for 2 whole semesters.


2 semestars only for those subjects. I am not talking about the rest of the comparable literatures, children literatures, linguistics, slavic languages, slavic literature,theory of literature and etc.....
 
samoth said:
HEY! Stop that! We have to have something to argue here, and recognizing that we're arguing from different POV's isn't going to do anything but bring this thread to a screeching halt.



:cow:
right. why in the world would we want that?
 
samoth said:
HEY! Stop that! We have to have something to argue here, and recognizing that we're arguing from different POV's isn't going to do anything but bring this thread to a screeching halt.



:cow:

lol
 
Top Bottom