Do you believe in Mythical Creatures such as:

[Sub-Zero]

Sorry that I have opinions and debate them. What a miscreant I am!




I don't own a laptop, but if you want to mail me one, I could use it at the hospital to post more opinions on topics.


No one seems to have any problem with anyone else having an opinion. lol.

Plus, my posting a definition clearly has nothing to do with my opinion. Some people's pride just makes them never admit that they are wrong. She is clearly completely incorrect, by definition.

you present yours in a very rude 'know-it-all' manner, and when someone is certain that your wrong, its frustrating how much of a stubborn jackass you can be.

you simply care way too much about being viewed as smart and all-knowing, which is a sad place to be

 

[heatherrae]

The deffinitions are clear. What is not clear to you is that mythology (and folklore) is still related to literature and thats why its studied when you are majoring in that subject.

a myth can be contained in literature, but does not have to be.

Once again, you are arguing with the definitions. Write to random house and tell them that they are wrong and should change their definitions, then.

This is a stupid debate that has little relevance to the meaning of the thread.

 

[Sub-Zero]

a myth can be contained in literature, but does not have to be.

Once again, you are arguing with the definitions. Write to random house and tell them that they are wrong and should change their definitions, then.

This is a stupid debate that has little relevance to the meaning of the thread.

quit fucking talking about random house.

its her feild.

people in her feild write the operational definitions of the things they study.

that makes her an authority to refute or agree with definitions (even if that is what she was doing).

you are not an authority.

so quit arguing.

im sorry to gang up on you in this thread, but i figure since everyone is basically saying what if been trying to tell you for ages, then i may as well hop in and support it.

 

[heatherrae]

you present yours in a very rude 'know-it-all' manner, and when someone is certain that your wrong, its frustrating how much of a stubborn jackass you can be.

you simply care way too much about being viewed as smart and all-knowing, which is a sad place to be

How about you try actually reading the debate kiddo instead of arguing with me without even looking. Very clearly you would see that I'm not wrong. Sorry I dont' back down from a debate. I know us women should know our places.

 

[Smurfy]

heather, i think what foreigngirl and samoth are saying (and perhaps it's not clear) is that these kind of animal species/creatures would never fall into a category of MYTHICAL/MYTH/MYTHOLOGY but rather CRYPTOZOOLOGICAL because it is an animal and not something like a fairy.
so it seems you have two categories of creatures (mythical & cryptozoological) all confused into one (Mythical). I think what they are saying is theses are two different types of creatures. Types of animals that are known to exist and then other creatures that are not animals, like fairies and such.

at least that's what I got from reading this thread.

did this post get overlooked?

 

[foreigngirl]

a myth can be contained in literature, but does not have to be.

Once again, you are arguing with the definitions. Write to random house and tell them that they are wrong and should change their definitions, then.

This is a stupid debate that has little relevance to the meaning of the thread.

I am not arguing with the definitions. I was arguing with you when I told you I have studied literature and you told me myth is not under that category. If it was so clearly different, it wouldnt have been subject. It would have been absent just the same as science and physics was absent.

Gilgamesh is a myth. We studied it under ancient literature. The apocryphas too. The oral traditions we studied them under folklore literature.

Please understand what I am trying to get through your thick head for the past 4-5 pages.

 

[foreigngirl]

did this post get overlooked?

I read it and you are right.

Me and HR agreed on that finally. That animals that had witnesses are cryptozoological and the rest of them are mythical

 

[samoth]

I never thought this thread would hit 250/1000. Man, I gotta learn how to make TOTW-quality threads myself, dammit.

 

[foreigngirl]

How about you try actually reading the debate kiddo instead of arguing with me without even looking. Very clearly you would see that I'm not wrong. Sorry I dont' back down from a debate. I know us women should know our places.

do you ever look back and hear yourself? You are belittling him as if he is just a dust on your counter. Who do you think you are believing you are an expertise in everything? You are clearly wrong. Admit it and move on to debating something that you know about.

 

[Sub-Zero]

How about you try actually reading the debate kiddo instead of arguing with me without even looking. Very clearly you would see that I'm not wrong. Sorry I dont' back down from a debate. I know us women should know our places.

this is why so many people hate to get in any exchange with you that doesnt include agreeing. i could read the entire thread, agree with you 100%, and then see foreigngirl studies in the feild, and completely believe her. i believe people who have the most experience on a subject, since they study it more and have more knowledge about it. i was arguing not about the topic, but about the fact that your very arrogant.

foreigngirl is one of the most levelheaded and kind wimmins on this forum, and you still find the need to be rude to her while arguing a topic that falls under HER area of expertise.

i wouldnt argue with you about stuff that youre an expert in, such as law, or sucking dick, so why are you being such a cunt.