Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Do you believe in Mythical Creatures such as:

foreigngirl said:
it took us where we are.

And using belittling words as "my dear" and "kiddo" is such a grown up thing to do. Humble too.

It takes a lot to get me going. But you succeeded in it. Congrats
Thank you. I guess your calling me "stupid" was very mature.

I'm glad you are worked up, though. :lmao:
 
heatherrae said:
Read the definition of literature or post a different one.
you are a waste of my time. You will never understand what I am trying to get through you.

Btw, I didnt have JUST 2 semestars of literature. I had way more than that. I had 2 semestars of extensive study on myths and folklor, just the same as every subject had 2 semestars. There is no need to study myths for full 4 years. Through the years you still work with them, but not as intensly. You use them in comparative literature. But of course, you gonna take this and turn in into something else that suits you.

Read this again, take a breath, wait a week if you need that much time to digest that and than tell us your precious opinion (I dont know what is so complicated about this):

I AM NOT ARGUING THE DEFINITIONS.

Childrens literature, for example, is a separate category and has its own definition.

SF literature is a separate category and has its own definition.

Mythology is a separate category and has its own definition.

THEY ARE ALL STUDIED UNDER LITERATURE. Thats what I am arguing. And yes, all myths fall under that broad category, because even folklor (oral literature and traditions) is studied under the same
 
heatherrae said:
Thank you. I guess your calling me "stupid" was very mature.

I'm glad you are worked up, though. :lmao:
just so we can be at the same level, dear.


And I am glad that you got me worked up too. Cuz when my husband comes home, I will have the craziest, most animalistic (sp???) sex that I have ever had in my life. So, its a very good thing.
 
foreigngirl said:
you are a waste of my time. You will never understand what I am trying to get through you.

Btw, I didnt have JUST 2 semestars of literature. I had way more than that. I had 2 semestars of extensive study on myths and folklor, just the same as every subject had 2 semestars. There is no need to study myths for full 4 years. Through the years you still work with them, but not as intensly. You use them in comparative literature. But of course, you gonna take this and turn in into something else that suits you.

Read this again, take a breath, wait a week if you need that much time to digest that and than tell us your precious opinion (I dont know what is so complicated about this):
It really isn't an important argument, FG. Don't get all worked up. In the scope of things it really doesn't matter whether you and I think myth has a wider rubric than that of literature, whether we think they should be studied further, whether we think bigfoot is going to come and tuck us in tonight.

It isn't anything worth arguing over.

Agree to disagree.
 
foreigngirl said:
just so we can be at the same level, dear.


And I am glad that you got me worked up too. Cuz when my husband comes home, I will have the craziest, most animalistic (sp???) sex that I have ever had in my life. So, its a very good thing.
Same level? I hadn't said a word to you like that. You called me stupid before I called you "dear." You pulled out the names. "Dear" can hardly be compared to "stupid" and I was calling sub "kiddo." I always call him "kiddo" whether we are agreeing or disagreeing.

Enjoy your sexy time though, gal. Woo hoo! lol. I'm not even remotely angry.
 
heatherrae said:
:rolleyes:

Why don't you try reading as well. I've been patiently posting definitions to a lady who called me "stupid" etc.

sorry if I have not patience for either of you, anymore.

If you want to write to Random house and tell them that their definitions are incorrect, go ahead.

Frankly, I couldn't give a flip whether a 19 year old boy who didn't read the thread wants to call me names.
lololol
 
heatherrae said:
It really isn't an important argument, FG. Don't get all worked up. In the scope of things it really doesn't matter whether you and I think myth has a wider rubric than that of literature, whether we think they should be studied further, whether we think bigfoot is going to come and tuck us in tonight.

It isn't anything worth arguing over.

Agree to disagree.
But thats what I tried to tell you - it doesnt have a wider rubric than literature, cuz literature is such a broad term and bunch of other categories fall under it. They are all separate, with separate definitions, but still under that wide repertoar. Just the same as science - it has a lot of different categories falling under it, but they are all under that broad term
 
heatherrae said:
Same level? I hadn't said a word to you like that. You called me stupid before I called you "dear." You pulled out the names. "Dear" can hardly be compared to "stupid" and I was calling sub "kiddo." I always call him "kiddo" whether we are agreeing or disagreeing.
NOW NOW HR Play nicely
 
heatherrae said:
It really isn't an important argument, FG. Don't get all worked up. In the scope of things it really doesn't matter whether you and I think myth has a wider rubric than that of literature, whether we think they should be studied further, whether we think bigfoot is going to come and tuck us in tonight.

It isn't anything worth arguing over.

Agree to disagree.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


then why act like a spoiled 13 year old princess about it
 
Top Bottom