The guiness guy has a good point.
Well, if you feel like trusting research by a man named Drinkwater, here is some:
Training leading to repetition failure enhances bench press strength gains in elite junior athletes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...d&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15903379&query_hl=1
What they found is that in training conditioned athletes 3x/week to failure on flat bench.
The NF group did 8x3
The RF groupd did 4x6
The workload total was the same.
The to failure group got stronger, according to the result. I assume they took another strength test at the conclusion of the experiment, but they did not say that. Not a great abstract.
Here's another comparing forced reps with to-failure training:
==================================================
Acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery to forced vs maximum repetitions multiple resistance exercises.
Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K.
Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
[email protected]
Acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery three days after the exercises were examined during the maximum repetitions (MR) and forced repetitions (FR) resistance exercise protocols in 16 male athletes. MR included 4 sets of leg presses, 2 sets of squats and 2 sets of knee extensions (with 12 RM) with a 2-min recovery between the sets and 4 min between the exercises. In FR the initial load was chosen to be higher than in MR so that the subject could not lift 12 repetitions per set by himself. After each set to failure the subject was assisted to perform the remaining repetitions to complete the 12 repetitions per set. Thus the exercise intensity was greater in FR than in MR. Both loading protocols led to the great acute increases (p < 0.05 - 0.001) in serum testosterone, free testosterone, cortisol and GH concentrations. However, the responses in cortisol (p < 0.05) and GH (p < 0.01) were larger in FR than in MR. The decrease of 56.5 % (p < 0.001) in maximal isometric force in FR was greater (p < 0.001) than that of 38.3 % in MR (p < 0.001) and force remained lower (p < 0.01) during the recovery in FR compared to MR. The larger decrease in isometric strength in FR than in MR was also associated with the decreased maximal voluntary EMG of the loaded muscles. The data indicate that the forced repetition exercise system induced greater acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses than a traditional maximum repetition exercise system and therefore it may be used to manipulate acute resistance exercise variables in athletes.
According to research performed at the Sports Science Laboratory, University of Delaware, glutamine doesn't work:
===================================================
The effects of high-dose glutamine ingestion on weightlifting performance.
Antonio J, Sanders MS, Kalman D, Woodgate D, Street C.
Sports Science Laboratory, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
The purpose of this study was to determine if high-dose glutamine ingestion affected weightlifting performance. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 6 resistance-trained men (mean +/- SE: age, 21.5 +/- 0.3 years; weight, 76.5 +/- 2.8 kg(-1)) performed weightlifting exercises after the ingestion of glutamine or glycine (0.3 g x kg(-1)) mixed with calorie-free fruit juice or placebo (calorie-free fruit juice only). Each subject underwent each of the 3 treatments in a randomized order. One hour after ingestion, subjects performed 4 total sets of exercise to momentary muscular failure (2 sets of leg presses at 200% of body weight, 2 sets of bench presses at 100% of body weight). There were no differences in the average number of maximal repetitions performed in the leg press or bench press exercises among the 3 groups. These data indicate that the short-term ingestion of glutamine does not enhance weightlifting performance in resistance-trained men.
Not that that has anything to do with training to failure. It came up in my search result and I thought I should post it up.