This is when I get really annoyed with black people............

[redsamurai]

Killing stirs debate over vigilante justice - Crime & courts- msnbc.com


Here we go again........two black kids hold up a pharmacy at gun point, the pharmacist shoots back and the NAACP is getting involved. I'm really fucking tired of this.

How can you ring up the pharmacist on "1st degree" murder? It's perfectly reasonable to question whether he had to fire those final shots, and he probably should spend some time in jail. "However", you can already see the kids mother making an emotional plea of "he didn't have to shoot my baby like that" and of course the DA is going to file the harshest charges possible to avoid riots. I am waiting for the day when some white kids stick up a black owned store and then get treated as little misguided choir boys. Again, the dude probably didn't have to seal the deal on the kid........."BUT", how many of you would have come back in and done the same thing after you watched two dudes point guns at you and your coworkers? I "might" have done the same thing in the adrenaline fueled rage that comes with a fire fight like that. Moral or immoral, it's the result of an unlawful act to begin with.....

They'll get the black community down there all riled up if they sense the verdict may not go their way......that's how the NAACP operates now.

I can "honestly" say that if it was my kid that tried to stick up a store and got shot in the process in the way this kid did........I'm not saying I would be completely complacent.......but I would have the honor and dignity not to say shit to the media and certainly not say any shit about the pharmacist. The reality is my kid entered a store with the intent of armed robbery............I mean really, enough said. So as much as I feel for a mother having lost her kid.................please shut the fuck up about your kid, he wasn't no angel. He made a life altering choice and probably would have shot someone else if things had gone just slightly differently...........than what? With some people there's just something wrong with their logic matrix. Something somewhere has just gone wrong.........I don't get it.

 

[Dial_tone]

Then, in a scene recorded by the drugstore's security camera, he went behind the counter, got another gun, and pumped five more bullets into the wounded teenager as he lay on the floor.

WTF? C'mon, rob!

 

[chris302001]

Lol I think those last 5 bullets were pretty condemning....

 

[canadianhitman]

The last 5 were a mistake because the guy was down and therefore no longer a threat...anything before that was fair game.

 

[Razorguns]

"Eliminate the threat?"

If you're being shot at by someone trying to kill you, guy go down, he's 1 foot away, he tries to get up - you going to stand there and let him jump for you and tackle you and try to get your gun and kill you? Or kill him? How do you DON'T know he doesn't have another gun in another pocket? Going to frisk him, take a chance?

Either way, he should've known is was a black kid - and if he shot him it would've turned into a racial incident. He was stupid. He should've only done it if the kid was white. He should go to jail for being unPC stupid.

r

 

[redsamurai]

the guy should not get off scott free for taking those final shots.........but I challenge any of you in this thread to say with 100% certainty you wouldn't do the same. If you knew that a month ago some similiar store owner got shot cause he rolled over and gave em what they wanted, you're saying with 100% certainty that you wouldn't finish the kid? 1st degree murder is ridiculous. That pharmacist would have done nothing different no matter the race of the robbers, but the situation is going to get penned as "racial" because the NAACP is involved. "This" is what irks me.

If it was me as the pharmacist I would absolutely accept some form of punishment as I did go too far........but extenuating circumstances forbid this from being a 1st degree case. By charging the dude in 1st degree they are making NO DISTINCTIONS between him and say if one of those kids had opened fire with an AK and hosed the entire store. As long as a legal distinction is made between a man put under those circustances and these kids who walk into a store to commit armed robbery of their own free will......I'm ok with it.

I just intensely dislike the double standard I see coming from black people in communities where something like this happens. Cops can't go into certain hoods without full body army and assault rifles cause their mere presence incites well founded paranoia that somebodies hustle is about to end. Yet a white store owner goes to far in defending himself and he's supposed to be held to the highest standard akin to being a police officer. This would be completely if a cop had done this. The dude was an old pharmacist. Imagine if any of us meatheads got in a fire fight like that and came back in and saw the first dude still moving..........it ain't right, but y'all got to understand. Shit like that, actually much worse, goes down in the hood DAILY and nobody fusses......."that's life" according to black people. So why does the standard change when it's an old white dude?

 

[Razorguns]

the guy should not get off scott free for taking those final shots.........but I challenge any of you in this thread to say with 100% certainty you wouldn't do the same. If you knew that a month ago some similiar store owner got shot cause he rolled over and gave em what they wanted, you're saying with 100% certainty that you wouldn't finish the kid? 1st degree murder is ridiculous. That pharmacist would have done nothing different no matter the race of the robbers, but the situation is going to get penned as "racial" because the NAACP is involved. "This" is what irks me.

If it was me as the pharmacist I would absolutely accept some form of punishment as I did go too far........but extenuating circumstances forbid this from being a 1st degree case. By charging the dude in 1st degree they are making NO DISTINCTIONS between him and say if one of those kids had opened fire with an AK and hosed the entire store. As long as a legal distinction is made between a man put under those circustances and these kids who walk into a store to commit armed robbery of their own free will......I'm ok with it.

I just intensely dislike the double standard I see coming from black people in communities where something like this happens. Cops can't go into certain hoods without full body army and assault rifles cause their mere presence incites well founded paranoia that somebodies hustle is about to end. Yet a white store owner goes to far in defending himself and he's supposed to be held to the highest standard akin to being a police officer. This would be completely if a cop had done this. The dude was an old pharmacist. Imagine if any of us meatheads got in a fire fight like that and came back in and saw the first dude still moving..........it ain't right, but y'all got to understand. Shit like that, actually much worse, goes down in the hood DAILY and nobody fusses......."that's life" according to black people. So why does the standard change when it's an old white dude?

Did you just arrive in America yesterday? If so, welcome! And yes, PC has been going on for 20 years at least. White people are evil, accept it.

And no I wouldn't do the same. If i was white and he was black, I know what hell would erupt in my life if I shot him. Instead i would run out the door to safety.

r

 

[calveless wonder]

fuck that little piece of shit. got what he deserved.

your judgement is not going to be the same under the circumstances.

you try to rob me and i have a chance to kill you, you're going to die.

play with fire get burned

 

[ponyfitness]

It's getting to the point where people seem to forget that the initial crime got committed in the first place and that the people involved should have to deal with the consequences. Why even have a business or home anymore if you can't defend it from a criminal?

Here in TO we just had a situation where a grocery store owner caught a guy shoplifting, went after him and brought him back to the store tied up and then called police. They showed up and charged the thief with theft (misdemeanor) and then charged the OWNER with kidnapping and assault (felonies)!

 

[Razorguns]

It's getting to the point where people seem to forget that the initial crime got committed in the first place and that the people involved should have to deal with the consequences. Why even have a business or home anymore if you can't defend it from a criminal?

Here in TO we just had a situation where a grocery store owner caught a guy shoplifting, went after him and brought him back to the store tied up and then called police. They showed up and charged the thief with theft (misdemeanor) and then charged the OWNER with kidnapping and assault (felonies)!

You can't do that in a country where criminals are viewed upon as victims!! He should've known better. Come to the us if he wants to do shit like that.

r