The 1000mg Primo Story.... With Before Pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Güclü_oglan]

sorry to go back to thread but is the Primo, a depot or tabs?

the inject, the tabs suck shit bro don't even think about them

 

[VictorBR]

the inject, the tabs suck shit bro don't even think about them

>> >actually the tabs are pretty effective if you take the right dose .

500 mg primo inject , and you would have to take 1 g tablets to have the same results since the absorption rate is about 50 % .

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=358615


Victor

 

[Güclü_oglan]

>> >actually the tabs are pretty effective if you take the right dose .

500 mg primo inject , and you would have to take 1 g tablets to have the same results since the absorption rate is about 50 % .

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=358615


Victor

sorry bro that thread is filled with nothing but speculations and i don't give much for it. I have seen numbers that the andriol concentration was only at 7% of the induced dosage so i seriously doubt that oral primo will go as high as 50% lol

i still think primo-tabs is just a scam, it might contain the shorter ester of methenolone but it's useless how no matter how authentic the contents are

i'd go with the depots...

 

[VictorBR]

well , we all have diferent opinions and it is all good .

PErsonally, I would try the TABS at 1.2 g per day IF I had the money to . They are so expensive that it is not even funny .


Victor

 

[Güclü_oglan]

well , we all have diferent opinions and it is all good .

PErsonally, I would try the TABS at 1.2 g per day IF I had the money to . They are so expensive that it is not even funny .


Victor

just get the raw hormone instead and eat it with a spoon lol. Costs like 20-30 D's by the gram if you find a good source, and if you're lucky it will even be concentrated at usp-grade

 

[gjohnson5]

maybe our view of 7% bf is different. 7% is razor sharp with striations, dry and crisp muscle, and a grainy look when flexed.

if you could show me untrained slobs who just happen to fall into this category, please do. i know what 7% looks like and it's a rare day when someone combines 230 with 7% bf. sorry, i just watched a 5'9" 280 pound masters competitior step on stage at 236 with about 5%. it doesn't just happen. i completely disagree.

there are people out there who are in great shape naturally, yes. but to say it like it means nothing, "oh yeah 230, 7% bf", that's ridiculous.

and i'd like to see what these bf percentages actually look like because alot of times people don't understand what single digit bf looks like.

I understand that 7% you expect the person to have good definition. But 7% is a quantitaive number measured by body fat calipers or hydrostatic test. Eyes are a poor indicator of bodyfat due to fat being stored around liver and kidney as was as along side of muscle cells. All fat is not subcutaneous (under the skin) so expecting a certain look from someone at 7% is a bad assumption.

 

[alltraps]

ive said it before, and i;ll say it again: primo is soooo over rated its not even funny. u think what satch did in 16 weeks of 1gram of primo is impressive? anyone can do the same with 500mg of prop and a good diet and training program! and who the fuck said hes 7% bf is completely blind. hes not even close. plus he looks like hes holding a lot of water. i thought primo wont do that? so what happened? 2.5 years in a gym is NOT a newbee, but its not a vet either and really, all that time shouldve been spend training naturaly and LEARNING. not juicing.

give me all the negative karma for bashing him or pimo, i dont give a shit and i;ll continue to bash it every single chance i get cuz I KNOW FIRST HAND its an inferrior drug to 90% of dugs out there that do the same job more effeciently and cost effecivey.
every advertisement, errrr i mean POST, i see about primo turns into a war. i wonder why? maybe cuz its always the same person starting them...claiming its soooo great.
and satch, your comment about WHEN YOURE ON TOP OF THE WORLD, THEY'LL TRY TO THROW YOU DOWN, is straight up arrogant and without ANY backing.
holy shit, i never thought the internet would get me so worked up, i guess i should get off the tren and try primo, might not get these episodes of RAGE like this.

 

[timtim]

I understand that 7% you expect the person to have good definition. But 7% is a quantitaive number measured by body fat calipers or hydrostatic test. Eyes are a poor indicator of bodyfat due to fat being stored around liver and kidney as was as along side of muscle cells. All fat is not subcutaneous (under the skin) so expecting a certain look from someone at 7% is a bad assumption.

right. off the bat there is 3% in bone marrow and surrounding internal organs. my best explanation of how i see bf%, dexter jackson is @4% in my eyes. so 7% to me is deep cuts you know. i do expect this from everyone if they say 7%. i never include the 3% internally, i'm talking fat we can see, dexter is 4%.

 

[LVTitan]

i've been around 5% most of my life... here's a pic of me on gear, and bulking, and i doubt my bf is even anywhere close to 10
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/4900/photo216xy.jpg

no reason why some people cant be 7% and still look like needsize

 

[gjohnson5]

K Time will be continued tomorrow....