The 1000mg Primo Story.... With Before Pics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RvN]

I was asking an IFBB Pro's advice in my gym around 10 years ago, I wanted to put on a stone of LBM(14 pounds), He told me to put on that much LEAN mass would take a year, whether i juiced or not. Which was pretty much spot on.

 

[Tweakle]

you can put on water and fat very fast, but 22lbs of muscle.. mm. How much GH were you taking along with the primo Satch? I'm interested to know how that increases the effectiveness of primo..

 

[TraxZBT]

Listen, we are talking about 22lbs of pure muscle here. Not fat and water weight. To give you an idea of how much 22lbs of muscle is, go to the supermarket and buy 22lbs of lean sirloin steak. Trust me, it is alot of beef! And there is no way satchboogie added 22lbs of lean muscle to his physique in 16 weeks!

EXACTLY!!!! there is no way unless you have the myostatin defect with primo... then maybe you can gain 10-15lbs of LBM.

 

[khemix]

I want to make sure satch see's this

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5113567&postcount=154

Hell, maybe I'll get bombed again...

 

[Outtlaw]

I better be one. Me @ 5%

http://www.villagephotos.com/pubbrowse.asp?folder_id=1350074

I'm sure you've seen these though.

I dont believe you're at 5% in those pics. If you are then you're holding a ton of water. At 5% you should have striations everywhere. The guy in my avatar has less bf% than you, and I'm not even sure he's at 5% there. But then again he probably is.

 

[khemix]

I dont believe you're at 5% in those pics. If you are then you're holding a ton of water. At 5% you should have striations everywhere. The guy in my avatar has less bf% than you, and I'm not even sure he's at 5% there. But then again he probably is.

I could be wrong, but I've never been tested above 6% in my life. In those pictures the lighting isn't right to show the striation though. Thats arnold in your avi, I remember that picture from one of his websites. I couldn't believe it was him because it doens't really look like him, but at the same time does. I need to get hydrostatically tested but I'm not sure of anywhere around here that does it.

 

[Outtlaw]

i've been around 5% most of my life... here's a pic of me on gear, and bulking, and i doubt my bf is even anywhere close to 10
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/4900/photo216xy.jpg

no reason why some people cant be 7% and still look like needsize

No way. Again, not the best photo, but NO WAY your at 5%. I dont know who's testing you guys, but somebody has told you wrong. Khemix has less bf than you and I dont believe he's at 5%. If your bf levels cant compare to the guy in my avatar then you are NOT at 5%.

No offense to you bro. Keep up the good work. But your not at 5% in those pics.

 

[Outtlaw]

I could be wrong, but I've never been tested above 6% in my life. In those pictures the lighting isn't right to show the striation though. Thats arnold in your avi, I remember that picture from one of his websites. I couldn't believe it was him because it doens't really look like him, but at the same time does. I need to get hydrostatically tested but I'm not sure of anywhere around here that does it.

I hear unless you can get a hook up, the hydrostatic weighing can be kinda costly. But yeah, 5% is really low. I think the Olympia guys go on stage at around like 3%, and those guys look emaciated bf wise (not very healthy looking). So you can imagine just how low 5% is in perspective to that.

 

[khemix]

No way. Again, not the best photo, but NO WAY your at 5%. I dont know who's testing you guys, but somebody has told you wrong. Khemix has less bf than you and I dont believe he's at 5%. If your bf levels cant compare to the guy in my avatar then you are NOT at 5%.

No offense to you bro. Keep up the good work. But your not at 5% in those pics.

Arnold, in your avi, has ALOT more muscle-mass than us, Taking that into account, someone that is alot thicker at 5% bf will look more ripped than someone that is smaller @ 5% bf due to the fact that the muscles themselves are bigger, causing the striations to be larger and deeper and the veins to push out more and spider more. I'm not positive about all this, but it makes good common sense to me. Please correct me if I'm wrong cause I don't wanna look like a douche-bag

Chris

 

[Outtlaw]

Arnold, in your avi, has ALOT more muscle-mass than us, Taking that into account, someone that is alot thicker at 5% bf will look more ripped than someone that is smaller @ 5% bf due to the fact that the muscles themselves are bigger, causing the striations to be larger and deeper and the veins to push out more and spider more. I'm not positive about all this, but it makes good common sense to me. Please correct me if I'm wrong cause I don't wanna look like a douche-bag

Chris

That is somewhat true, but at 5% you would still be seriously ripped. 5% is still 5% whether you weigh 240 or 180.