nelmsjer
New member
anotherbutters said:But that's what I was doing before, with almost straight legs and a much greater range of motion. Think of bench press - you don't strive for greater range of motion there. You retract your shoulder blades, keep your elbows in and push to your feet, doing everything to put you in the most advantageous position. You don't try to lift the bar as high into the air as possible.
Hmmm.....we have 1) a misunderstanding (I think) and 2) an anatomical difference.
In your bench press example, I see your point and your line of thinking, but I think it's a bad example, only because it seems to show a different concept. First, what you said is the complete truth...you get set up in the bench press to move the most weight, which is what you've described. I agree with that.
However, for the point that I was trying to make...in the bench press, the concept of not lowering the bar enough to touch your chest (creating a shorter ROM) would be the same as not allowing your arms to go straight for the bent row. You are missing out on a portion of the lift. Does that make sense, or is my explanation still jacked up?
And here is why I think we have an anatomical difference that explains everything:
anotherbutters said:What, can't everyone get down to the bar with straight legs? I do have short legs, but maybe I just have flexible hammies too. I can get my palms flat on the floor when trying to touch my toes, with my knees locked.
That is a combination of short legs (as you mentioned) and great flexibility. Nice work.

End transmission. Confirm understanding.
