Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the debate
- Thread starter needtogetaas
- Start date
bigmann245
New member
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
did someone forget someone??? ahemmmm ahemmmm cough cough!!!!
did someone forget someone??? ahemmmm ahemmmm cough cough!!!!
needtogetaas
New member
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
well you went cotb. Fuck it If you still want it then you can still be on the ballot. 830pm est time is the debate people
830pm est time
well you went cotb. Fuck it If you still want it then you can still be on the ballot. 830pm est time is the debate people
830pm est time
needtogetaas
New member
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
I am taking questions for the candidates now
I am taking questions for the candidates now
Last edited:
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
I still find this questions and debate idea rather strange and non-sequitur.
From what I saw on the female debate thread, they posted responses to questions that seem to have little or nothing to do with function of this new position. Questions and answers about "what would you change" and &c. aren't really relevant.
I mean, I love drama and stuff as much as anyone here, but it really doesn't make any sense to me beyond putting on a show for people. The entertainment's fine, but it really doesn't seem to wash.
Is this position well-defined by administrators and moderators, or is it some flying-blind-we'll-see-what-happens kinda thing? (I thought it was the former.)
I was under the impression that it's just someone who plays a role not unlike that of a public defender when there's a dispute about, e.g., moderator actions, bannings, behavior, board stuff, personal quarrels &c., and handles disputes as they come privately from the individual(s) concerned (... or more openly at times as well, I suppose, as much drama here does seem to happen in that manner).
This "what would you change" stuff, campaigning, mod board access and other stuff doesn't seem necessary as far as I can understand.
... could just be me, too. I'll never pretend to understand anything about politics and stuff.
I still find this questions and debate idea rather strange and non-sequitur.
From what I saw on the female debate thread, they posted responses to questions that seem to have little or nothing to do with function of this new position. Questions and answers about "what would you change" and &c. aren't really relevant.
I mean, I love drama and stuff as much as anyone here, but it really doesn't make any sense to me beyond putting on a show for people. The entertainment's fine, but it really doesn't seem to wash.
Is this position well-defined by administrators and moderators, or is it some flying-blind-we'll-see-what-happens kinda thing? (I thought it was the former.)
I was under the impression that it's just someone who plays a role not unlike that of a public defender when there's a dispute about, e.g., moderator actions, bannings, behavior, board stuff, personal quarrels &c., and handles disputes as they come privately from the individual(s) concerned (... or more openly at times as well, I suppose, as much drama here does seem to happen in that manner).
This "what would you change" stuff, campaigning, mod board access and other stuff doesn't seem necessary as far as I can understand.
... could just be me, too. I'll never pretend to understand anything about politics and stuff.
needtogetaas
New member
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
I will try to do so in this debate.
Yes you have some points bro. You are right about what the job details as well. So keeping the ??? to that subject would be best.I still find this questions and debate idea rather strange and non-sequitur.
From what I saw on the female debate thread, they posted responses to questions that seem to have little or nothing to do with function of this new position. Questions and answers about "what would you change" and &c. aren't really relevant.
I mean, I love drama and stuff as much as anyone here, but it really doesn't make any sense to me beyond putting on a show for people. The entertainment's fine, but it really doesn't seem to wash.
Is this position well-defined by administrators and moderators, or is it some flying-blind-we'll-see-what-happens kinda thing? (I thought it was the former.)
I was under the impression that it's just someone who plays a role not unlike that of a public defender when there's a dispute about, e.g., moderator actions, bannings, behavior, board stuff, personal quarrels &c., and handles disputes as they come privately from the individual(s) concerned (... or more openly at times as well, I suppose, as much drama here does seem to happen in that manner).
This "what would you change" stuff, campaigning, mod board access and other stuff doesn't seem necessary as far as I can understand.
... could just be me, too. I'll never pretend to understand anything about politics and stuff.
I will try to do so in this debate.
needtogetaas
New member
Re: Mens ombudsmen debate tomorrow 830pm est time. With a new member added to the de
Similar threads
