Let's get some more action in here

[samoth]

lmao, right after i post on the mod board about you being a mod you had to bash the AF products

Read the sticky here.

This is a science board about TRUE SCIENCE. No lies, manipulation, drug-pushing. This is a forum for pure, unadulterated scientific analysis and I will NOT hold back because someone wants money.

I will not "bash" others' products. But I WILL state the truth behind them. And the truth is that there is VERY LITTLE, IF ANY, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT NOOTROPICS DO ANYTHING WHATSOEVER.

I will always stand by my morals. And science is about truth, not making money by bending the truth and manipulating people. I can't tolerate that.

 

[samoth]

#1 before you start tossing out conclusions, you might want to get your facts straight.
#2 Neurogenex contains Piractem (2-oxo)- 400mg/cap- an effective dose (you may debate its action)
#3 Neurogenex contains galantamine hydrobromide (sold under the trade name reminyl and razadyne)- FDA approved for alzheimers. (galantamine is plant derived and naturally occuring)
#4 vinpocetine, bacopin, huperzine and choline dihydrogen citrate all have established research backing their actions.

Of course you say this, you sell these items. You make money off them when people buy them, whether or not they work.

I wanted this forum for actual discussion, not drug/supp-pushers trying to make a buck.

IF YOU SELL IT, DON'T TALK ABOUT IT HERE. This is an unbiased forum where people WON'T get shot down for speaking something that the buisnessmen and advertisers don't agree with.

Thanks for your cooperation and compliance.

 

[H_T_]

Of course you say this, you sell these items. You make money off them when people buy them, whether or not they work.

I wanted this forum for actual discussion, not drug/supp-pushers trying to make a buck.

IF YOU SELL IT, DON'T TALK ABOUT IT HERE. This is an unbiased forum where people WON'T get shot down for speaking something that the buisnessmen and advertisers don't agree with.

Thanks for your cooperation and compliance.

sorry for not voting on your poll & getting away from the topic. where's Stephen Hawking? he's not smart enough?

 

[gjohnson5]

Of course you say this, you sell these items. You make money off them when people buy them, whether or not they work.

I wanted this forum for actual discussion, not drug/supp-pushers trying to make a buck.

IF YOU SELL IT, DON'T TALK ABOUT IT HERE. This is an unbiased forum where people WON'T get shot down for speaking something that the buisnessmen and advertisers don't agree with.

Thanks for your cooperation and compliance.

I would agree this will place bias on "the word on the street" in terms of the effectiveness of prescription and OTC drugs

Trust me , me and Macro have had PM's on this topic and he knows that

 

[bran987]

Read the sticky here.

This is a science board about TRUE SCIENCE. No lies, manipulation, drug-pushing. This is a forum for pure, unadulterated scientific analysis and I will NOT hold back because someone wants money.

I will not "bash" others' products. But I WILL state the truth behind them. And the truth is that there is VERY LITTLE, IF ANY, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT NOOTROPICS DO ANYTHING WHATSOEVER.

I will always stand by my morals. And science is about truth, not making money by bending the truth and manipulating people. I can't tolerate that.

dude it's your board I agree with you, it was just ironic is all. cracked me up.

 

[macrophage69alpha]

samoth,
you made very open ended statement about a product which you have little knowledge of. So if you dont want your views on nootropics contradicted dont mention neurogenex.

while in agreement that there is conflicting data on the racetams, your lumping of neurogenex into a category without looking at the research behind the ingredients is not "scientific" nor particularly informative.


just enter those terms on pubmed

 

[samoth]

samoth,
you made very open ended statement about a product which you have little knowledge of. So if you dont want your views on nootropics contradicted dont mention neurogenex.

while in agreement that there is conflicting data on the racetams, your lumping of neurogenex into a category without looking at the research behind the ingredients is not "scientific" nor particularly informative.


just enter those terms on pubmed

Then the issue is settled and resolved then.

 

[bran987]

for some reason I don't think macro is gonna win the 100,000 pts.

 

[H_T_]

Einstein would be the choice from about 99% of "typical" Americans. and that's because Einstein is usually used in conjunction with some sort of insult.

 

[macrophage69alpha]

for some reason I don't think macro is gonna win the 100,000 pts.

got hope.. fingers crossed