jh1
New member
Gambino said:congrats bro, we're all cheering you on over here in michigan
a victory all men can saviour, you never hear about men winning in situations like these
so in your overall opinion, is the system unfair towards men?
and i'm confused about the $$...you continue to pay child support even with custody?
Yeah, there is still a bias - at least in my case. Before the drug tests came back, the judge said that I'd be required to pay the child care cost to the x simply so she can give the money to our provider - which was total bullshit. As if I wasn't capable of doing so - he said he always did it that way - meaning whoever received support would also receive all money for child care. He also was leaning toward making me pay a higher percentage due to the amount of money I make vs. her money... but that made no sense since the calculations already took that into account.
The drug tests changed everything, obviously.
I agreed to pay the money even though I have full custody because I want the precident to be there - that is what I have always paid and will continue to pay and she has had excess funds to pay for coke.
So, if she does get cleaned up we probably won't have to revist the issue of child support AMOUNTS and have the judge says she's clean now and go back to wanting me to pay these rediculous amounts of money.
It really was crazy how much money they wanted me to pay, I couldn't beleive it. THe amount I agreed to, is STILL unfair - she gets 66% of the 'pool' of money the state defines based on how much we both make. Each of of contribute to that pool based on our percentage of the combined income. But when the devide it - they assume the one how pays pays 100%, but then I get a 'DISCOUNT' of UP TO 33% for having custody for x number of nights. It's completely rediculous.
The system needs to be adjusted to accomodate 50/50 parenting plans, right now it assumes one parent always is the MAIN parent and that parent is the one that makes less money. It's fucked up.