Interesting Revelation About PRIMOBOLAN

[ConanX]

Thanks a lot Nelson, I appreciate it.

 

[kidd73]

Damn it Nelson! First A-Rod blows the lid on Primo (albeit lying out loud while doing so), and now this! Next time I re-up it's going to cost even more.
You're not supoosed to talk about fight club.

 

[Nelson Montana]

Questions! Questions Questions!

Introducing a new steroid doesn't make a difference. It's all nitrogen retention and androgen reception.

Oral primobolan is not cost effective -- unless you have an extra $1000 a week to throw around.

My clients T may drop but it's doubtful most of that was natural test.

Yes, it may be a good time to buy stock in Primobolan. Everyone wants it!

 

[hiasdamoon]

With cycles like this you probably need no dex during the cycle and may not even need any PC, or at least VERY little. (375mgs is borderline, depending on how sensitive you are)

If you use POST CYCLE and Sustain, that should be enough to control the slight elevation in e.

The only disparity I'd have with this is 40 mgs of var for 6 weeks. That's more liver toxic than people realize. And you really won't need it. A couple of weeks to solidify the gains is all you need. You won't grow much more muscle after that and staying on longer will just delay recovery.

This is quite interesting. So your saying the PC would actually be less intense and still would maximize keeping gains. Of course is someone was to run Test above 375 then normal PCT would be required. This could change the way people do cycles forever..Thanks for the information Nelson!

 

[doublebicep]

Questions! Questions Questions!

I know I sure do appreciate what you share Nelson.

Thank you!

 

[Nelson Montana]

I know I sure do appreciate what you share Nelson.

Thank you!

Always glad when someone can get something out of a post.

 

[soupeater]

any updates?

 

[C0LUMB0]

any updates?

updates on what ? this thread is more than a year old

 

[10001110101]

Anyway, he had a blood test 2 weeks ago and just got the results. Everything is perfect but here's a curious twist. His testosterone was 2150!

Now 100 mgs of test isn't enough to boost T that high so it's got to be Primo -- you know, the stuff they say ISN'T ANDROGENIC. AND DOESN'T SUPRESS!

ALL steroids are androgens. And even one as mild as Primo will affect T level and production. It also debunks the need for needing 300, 400, 500 and more mgs of test with a cycle.

It also shows that you can have superphysiological levels of test and be able to recover pretty easily -- as anyone who's done a Primo cycle will attest.

So once again, all these gram cycles and drol, d-bol, mega test dosages etc -- it's all bullshit. You need just a slight elevation in T and increased nitrogen retention. So Primo really is the optimum steroid , and ironically, something that is even LESS androgenic and MORE anabolic would be even better.

Maybe someday.

Once again, the leaps of logic are amazing.

First, those tests, like you say, detect androgens, so they are somewhat non-specific for testosterone, and all AAS in the blood stream will increase the levels (this is not 1:1).

I'm not sure how this in any way "debunks" the supposed "need" to use above-gram dosages of AAS, or that these high doses are somehow "bullshit". Gains made on steroids are dose-dependent, period. They are also dependent on training, diet, genetics, and a million other variables, but when considering just this one variable in isolation, muscular hypertrophy and strength increases are absolutely dose-dependent with relation to AAS usage.

Certainly a person can understand that you can achieve supraphysiologic levels of androgens by administering exogenous steroids to elicit said effect.

You praise primobolan for its "potency" as an androgen, then also praise the ease at which you recover from it. Well which is it? The two statements are mutually exclusive.

You then go on to assert, based on a completely failed attempt at logical persuasion, that "primo really is the optimum steroid."

Not to mention that the 100mg/wk of testosterone is completely relevant and significant to these findings. 100mg/wk is commonly prescribed for upper-range testosterone replacement therapy, and provides the anabolic benefit necessary to distinguish a male athlete from a female (rather substantial, many would agree).

Seriously, this isn't even pseudoscience.

 

[dr.shavargo]

what about test in cycles not including primobolan?

say a cycle of 50mg Tren Ace ED with only 100mg of test/week? doesnt sound apealing to me personally... but if theres more info on this type of thing id like to know