Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Hockey Dad was Sentenced for 6 to 10 yrs!!!!

Warik said:


Do you know what kind of legal precedent this sets? Let's start with habitual wife-beaters.

"Your Honor, my client was simply beating his wife. He was unaware that her body was incapable of surviving the blasts from the baseball bat. They have had similar disputes before, and she survived just fine. If anything, he should only be charged with domestic abuse."

Hey, how about rapists.

"Yes officer... I was raping her at gunpoint. I didn't mean to kill her! The gun went off by accident! If I really wanted to kill her, you think I would have bothered with the rape?"

Shit, how about vehicular manslaughter.

"I'm sorry Your Honor. I did see him in the road and I didn't slow down... but I thought he could get out of the way in time. When I realized he couldn't, it was too late! Wahhhh I'm sorry!"

Give me a fucking break.

murder - the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought

Did he kill a man? Yes.
Did he do so unlawfully? Yes.

Hence, he murdered a man. Hell, all lexicography aside so that Puc won't be on my back, forget the definition of the word. He killed a man in cold blood and he deserves to either die for it, or spend the rest of his life in prison.

This sentence is only giving the American People the message that murder is excusable - much like I'm sure the Yates Butcher case will also show.



You believe murder is excusable, and I'm the one with problems?

oa048.jpg


"Mr. Kettle, you're black."

-Warik

Bro, You crack me up!!! LOL You cannot compare rapists and habitual wife beaters to the incident which happened at the hockey rink. That's like comparing apples and oranges.
Rapists and HWB'S are knowingly commiting a crime.

The hockey incident was plain and simple. One guys is attacked by another, they both go at it and fight. The bigger guy goes a little over board and kills the guy, ACCIDENTELY. It was not premediated murder!!!

Now tell me is that really COLD BLOODED MURDER?
Do you really think he was really wanted to kill the guy on purpose?

I'm not saying he should get off on killing the man. What he got was enough of a punishment.
 
I think he deserved more time in jail....

Anyone who cant control themself to that extent is a threat to society. I have lost control of myself during fights and punched somone repeatedly but i would never slam their head into the ground like that (unless they had a weapon and i felt my life was in danger)....he needs to pay for what he did to those kids....self defense is not slamming someone;s head into the ground as they lay there defenseless...
 
Fuck him he got what he deserved. "Oh his poor son":nopity: yeah well maybe he should have though of him while he was beating a man to death.:finger:
 
one time in high school...we had a bench clearing brawl and about 60 of their fans jumped over the boards and onto the ice....we were hitting people with sticks and trying to kick people with our skates. I drew a lot of blood that day and knocked out a few teeth too.

My punishment was that we had to go to Burger King.

Junta should have thrown the guy and walked away.
 
I didn't like the looks of him anyway. I'm glad he's in jail. the prick prolly got his son to lie on the witness stand too. serves him right.
 
Warik said:


Do you know what kind of legal precedent this sets? Let's start with habitual wife-beaters.

"Your Honor, my client was simply beating his wife. He was unaware that her body was incapable of surviving the blasts from the baseball bat. They have had similar disputes before, and she survived just fine. If anything, he should only be charged with domestic abuse."

Hey, how about rapists.

"Yes officer... I was raping her at gunpoint. I didn't mean to kill her! The gun went off by accident! If I really wanted to kill her, you think I would have bothered with the rape?"

Shit, how about vehicular manslaughter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then all boxers should be charged with attempted murder. Hockey players that get into a fight the same. A baseball pitcher that throws a ball at a player on purpose and so on. When two boxers get into the ring together, they are doing it to fuck the other up. Not to kill each other but if one should die, there would be no charges.(for the most part) but by what your saying is there should be. The little fuck was running his mouth and started the fight. And when one does that(common sense) would tell him that there would be a retaliation. Just like two boxers--none of them wanted the other to die, but one did.

Bobbet's wife cut his cock off and threw it out of a window wishing that he would die. He didn't and she walked away with a slap on the wrist. Now this is someone who tried to kill someone.
 
Wombat said:
Then all boxers should be charged with attempted murder.

How do you figure? I'm talkin about the taking of another man's life being MURDER, and you're talking about two boxers duking it out being attempted murder. Interesting trap, but painfully ineffective.

Two men putting on boxing gloves and stepping into the ring in order to participate in an exhibitional fight is NOT a crime. Unjustly taking another man's life IS a crime.

*I* am not asking for ANY laws to be changed - you are.

-Warik
 
Warik said:


How do you figure? I'm talkin about the taking of another man's life being MURDER, and you're talking about two boxers duking it out being attempted murder. Interesting trap, but painfully ineffective.

Two men putting on boxing gloves and stepping into the ring in order to participate in an exhibitional fight is NOT a crime. Unjustly taking another man's life IS a crime.

*I* am not asking for ANY laws to be changed - you are.

-Warik

Boxers have killed each other before but do they get charged for a crime?

Is that murder Warick?
 
Last edited:
Warik said:


No, they don't - but they should.



It sure is.

-Warik

Apparently, it's not murder because if it was they would be charged with a crime. A boxer that has killed another has never been charged with a crime. They just give money to the family of the boxer who died.

I still don't think you understand what the word murder means and when it is applicable.
 
Top Bottom