R77M said:I just spent the last 45 minutes reading through this post. Aside from all the flaming there is alot of great information. I have read alot of Nelson's posts and find some of his theories very interesting. However, I really have to agree with Silent Method on this one. By no means am I flaming or attacking Nelson's credibility, but the following seems true:
Silent Method's statement was a post-workout drink high in carbs would increase the muscle growth.
Nelson's statement was it will not increase muscle growth any more than a regular meal anytime of the day.
In laymans (sp.) terms, according to Silent Method, high carbs increase insulin which, in turn, increases protien uptake in the muscles. At the same time catabolic effects are reduced. It would seem that post work-out reduction of catabolic effects alone would contribute to increased muscle growth, but the addition of protien uptake creates an environement in which inceased muscle growth is almost assured.
As to the time frame. Does it not make sense that your body is depleated of energy (calories) upon completion of a workout. And the sooner you provide rapid energy (calories) the better, so the body will consume the calories you provide and not your reserves, primarily muscle tissue. Thus the anti-catabolic state. And aren't the best calories for immediate use after exercise are simple carbs.
It is a very sound theory and makes alot of sense. Silent Method provided definitive information and concise thoughts as to his position. It would be very interesting to hear Nelson's argument in terms of the question posed. Why do you feel muscle growth will not be increased with a post-workout drink as opposed to a regular meal?
This is no flame. It is a very interesting subject which, with civil debate would no doubt be invaluable to all of us. I mean a post-workout drink that actually contributes to muscle growth. Nelson, if you have an argument or a position that contradicts this, by all means present your case and lets debate.
So we're back to discussing the topic?! Oh no! : )
No flame taken bro. I think the misunderstanding here isn't that I DON'T think the high carb thing has merit. My point is that a high carb as oppossed to a low carb, 15 minutes or 25 mnutes...wait a minute... I've been through all this already. The bottom line is this; Sugar isn't a horrible as people make it out to be and it isn't as magical as people make it out to be. In the long run I doubt if the amount of muscle gained over the course of year but attmepting to time the exact perfect time to drink a "dextrose only" protein shake after a workout is inconsequential. Will you have another 2 ounzes of muscle at the end of the year if you use dextrose instead of sucrose? It's doubtful, but I'll concede. MAYBE you will. Maybe not. So the question is, "Is it worth it obsessing over this? I say no. Others disagree. And that's all this is. Nothing more, nothing less -- except for all the hatred toward me because of my beliefs.
Pretty amazing, isn't it?