monkeyballs
New member
I want to chime in here....
My guess is that the whole purpose of this thread is that "swimmar" want to swim faster.
So the essence of your question is this, will ALA supplementation help my times.
The anecdotal evidence that I can provide- not at all.
I'm not a swimmer, but I am an athlete who is only concerned with the bottom line of moving as fast as I can from point A to point B. As for my own experience, ALA will not help the bottom line, and contrary to many people's experience, I gained a small ammount of bodyfat during the course of my use. All other variables in my training were identical, so I'm virtually convinced that ALA was the culprit. Yes...I could be wrong. I'm open to suggestions, but I feel fairly certain that ALA is not usefull in helping the athlete achieve the bottom line. Every national sports machine agrees with me as well. Not one (none) uses ALA as a team sponsered supplement. Athetes, like BB's, are concerned with the "real world" results that everyone here is raving about, and In the "real world", ALA has not been shown to help athletes.
Now as for a ketogenic diet, I can't imagine a worse Idea for an athlete than to deplete his body of fuel in an attempt to get rid of fat. You are a sprinter, so am I. Your training will go to shit pronto if you follow a ketogenic diet. Even though your a sprinter, your body will still need carbs for a whole slew of reasons in order to function at its peak ability. While in ketosis your recovery will suck, therefore you training volume will suffer, and ultimatly your training intensity has gone to the shitter as well. The end result is slower times. Bottom line.
You mentioned Lance Armstrong earlier...he consumes up to 5000 calories a day, 60% of which is carbohydrates, many of them simple. Yes, it has been shown that his body uses fat for fuel more efficently than just about anyone on the planet, but the word "ketosis" isn't anywhere in his vocabulary. Nor is it in that of just about any elite athlete. Elite is the key word here. I'm sure high school sprinters can get away with a ketogenic diet, and depending on what level your swimming at, you may too.
That's my .2$.
I'd also like to add that this is a great post with a very healthy debate going on; A debate which I would like to see stay as constructive as possible. And for those of you who think that this thread is has too much "fancy book learnin", there are plenty of other posts for you to read, let the text nerds enjoy this one.
My guess is that the whole purpose of this thread is that "swimmar" want to swim faster.
So the essence of your question is this, will ALA supplementation help my times.
The anecdotal evidence that I can provide- not at all.
I'm not a swimmer, but I am an athlete who is only concerned with the bottom line of moving as fast as I can from point A to point B. As for my own experience, ALA will not help the bottom line, and contrary to many people's experience, I gained a small ammount of bodyfat during the course of my use. All other variables in my training were identical, so I'm virtually convinced that ALA was the culprit. Yes...I could be wrong. I'm open to suggestions, but I feel fairly certain that ALA is not usefull in helping the athlete achieve the bottom line. Every national sports machine agrees with me as well. Not one (none) uses ALA as a team sponsered supplement. Athetes, like BB's, are concerned with the "real world" results that everyone here is raving about, and In the "real world", ALA has not been shown to help athletes.
Now as for a ketogenic diet, I can't imagine a worse Idea for an athlete than to deplete his body of fuel in an attempt to get rid of fat. You are a sprinter, so am I. Your training will go to shit pronto if you follow a ketogenic diet. Even though your a sprinter, your body will still need carbs for a whole slew of reasons in order to function at its peak ability. While in ketosis your recovery will suck, therefore you training volume will suffer, and ultimatly your training intensity has gone to the shitter as well. The end result is slower times. Bottom line.
You mentioned Lance Armstrong earlier...he consumes up to 5000 calories a day, 60% of which is carbohydrates, many of them simple. Yes, it has been shown that his body uses fat for fuel more efficently than just about anyone on the planet, but the word "ketosis" isn't anywhere in his vocabulary. Nor is it in that of just about any elite athlete. Elite is the key word here. I'm sure high school sprinters can get away with a ketogenic diet, and depending on what level your swimming at, you may too.
That's my .2$.
I'd also like to add that this is a great post with a very healthy debate going on; A debate which I would like to see stay as constructive as possible. And for those of you who think that this thread is has too much "fancy book learnin", there are plenty of other posts for you to read, let the text nerds enjoy this one.