Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

zane vs arnold

jochensa said:
haha speaking of diarhea of the mouth. you have a chronic case my friend. 20yrs old talking smack, what is this world coming to
bruddah I may be 20, going on 900.
 
mlong23 said:
Good breakdown. Personally, I think Zane looked like a bitch when compared to other bodybuilders. He had the physique most ladies like, but not the body that a bodybuilder is looking for (even in those times). I see some guys at my gym that are on par with Zane or close to him. His physique is much more attainable than most bodybuilders, but I think he looked puny next to the other guys. He wouldn't win a novice show today, as where Arnold may when a novice with his upper body.
You're fucking high bro! You don't think Zane could win a novice show? The dude had absolutely perfect symetry and good size for his frame - he just didn't have freak size. I guarantee if Zane from 20yrs ago walked into your gym people would notice in a big way and he would stand out. Hell, he would stand out in my gym and we have some total freaks in there. Plus it was a different time. People argue that Arnold was the greatest ever and I wouldn't disagree BUT put him in the O today looking the best he ever looked and he's dead last. Probably would struggle to even get his pro card. Zane had a better build than at least 99% of the guys on this board.
 
youngguns said:
Zane was never 4% , lowest my guess would be 6, that was on the best day,. Same with arnold. And my arms are 17 inches, Zane was tiny.
C'mon bro, just because your arms are the same size as Zane doesn't put you in his catagory. My arms are about the same and there are guys in my gym that have arms alot bigger but it's the overall picture than matters, not circumference of any particular bodypart.
 
bluetwistedsteel67 said:
You're fucking high bro! You don't think Zane could win a novice show? The dude had absolutely perfect symetry and good size for his frame - he just didn't have freak size. I guarantee if Zane from 20yrs ago walked into your gym people would notice in a big way and he would stand out. Hell, he would stand out in my gym and we have some total freaks in there. Plus it was a different time. People argue that Arnold was the greatest ever and I wouldn't disagree BUT put him in the O today looking the best he ever looked and he's dead last. Probably would struggle to even get his pro card. Zane had a better build than at least 99% of the guys on this board.
First off, arnold was not the best. That is not debatable, it is a fact. bodyBUILDER not body small legs.
Zane was very small for the Olympia, even for the 70's. You have small arms.
 
Ding Ding Ding.....We have a winner......My arms are almost 18 and my legs are 29 inches.....I weigh 240 and If I were to cut up I could come in around 198-200 or so.....Does it mean I could beat Zane ?


HELL NO !!!

The guy is just on a different level genetically than most....Many guys walk around with Huge arms and legs it does not mean they can go win the O.
bluetwistedsteel67 said:
C'mon bro, just because your arms are the same size as Zane doesn't put you in his catagory. My arms are about the same and there are guys in my gym that have arms alot bigger but it's the overall picture than matters, not circumference of any particular bodypart.
 
bluetwistedsteel67 said:
C'mon bro, just because your arms are the same size as Zane doesn't put you in his catagory. My arms are about the same and there are guys in my gym that have arms alot bigger but it's the overall picture than matters, not circumference of any particular bodypart.
thats not the point, Im 19, Iv been working out for alittle over a year, this was a full grown man in the sport for a long time and juiced. HE WAS NOT SPECIAL/ People give those guys too much credit.
 
youngguns said:
First off, arnold was not the best. That is not debatable, it is a fact. bodyBUILDER not body small legs.
Zane was very small for the Olympia, even for the 70's. You have small arms.
Bro, do ever wonder why everybody on EF hates you?
 
Love it. Zane too small for your taste? LOL

Yeah, and Jack Dempey was only 5' 7" 180 pounds but he'd still kick some hot shot black belt karate guys ass and a few of his friends at the same time.


I love when fat asses think they look better than this because they're "bigger."


Can't imagine why the ladies would prefer this over you.

http://www.bodybuildbid.com/bodypics/pics/zane/zane5.html


And sure, it's easy to get this ripped. I see it all the time.

http://www.bodybuilders.com/zane9.jpg


Wait a minute Young Guns, come to think of it, you do look a little like this.

http://clay_b8690.tripod.com/ZaneFrank/FZane0005.jpg


Yep, pretty scrawny here. Maybe Ulter can help him out

http://clay_b8690.tripod.com/ZaneFrank/FZane0006.jpg


I really have to laugh at the attitude I hear sometimes. I also think it's hilarious that people think it doesn't matter if you're natural, use a tiny bit of gear or 2 grams a week. That's like saying it doesn't matter if you ride a bike or a race car, all that matters is how much distance you cover. It matters.
 
Top Bottom